AutoRFP.ai vs Icertis
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Icertis is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 0.3 for AutoRFP.ai, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose AutoRFP.ai if…
- You need ISO 27001:2022 certified or SOC 2 Type II audited or GDPR compliant or UK GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant or EU Cloud Code of Conduct coverage
- Listed among G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Choose Icertis if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 0.3)
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or FedRAMP or NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 or TISAX or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or GDPR or ITAR or Microsoft SSPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | AutoRFP.ai | Icertis |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 3.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #42 | #23 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.9% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 5 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 40% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AutoRFP.ai 0pp · Icertis 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Icertis leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | AutoRFP.ai | Icertis |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #16 | #1 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AutoRFP.ai | Icertis |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | $899 / mo | — |
| Free plan | No | — |
| Deployment | Cloud on AWS, hosted in the US (Oregon), EU (Frankfurt) or Australia (Sydney), depending on customer needs. | Public or private cloud |
| Integrations | 34+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001:2022 certified, SOC 2 Type II audited, GDPR compliant, UK GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, EU Cloud Code of Conduct | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, FedRAMP, NIST 800-171 Rev. 2, TISAX, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, GDPR, ITAR, Microsoft SSPA |
| Support | Unlimited support on all plans, Online training included, White-glove onboarding, with previous responses imported within 48 hours, Security questions handled at security@autorfp.ai | — |
| Founded | 2022 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Brisbane, Queensland, Australia | Bellevue, WA, United States |
| Employees | 11–50 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Round from existing backer B Capital, reportedly to pay down debt |
| Best for | Bid and sales teams that answer high volumes of RFPs, DDQs and security questionnaires, from startups to Fortune 500 companies. | Large global enterprises that manage high volumes of complex contracts |
Plans side by side
AutoRFP.ai
Icertis
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AutoRFP.ai
- Listed among G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Icertis
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
- Named as a prominent contract lifecycle management option
- Suited to large multinational enterprises
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AutoRFP.ai vs Icertis”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/autorfp-ai-vs-icertis, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.