AutoRFP.aiThe agentic AI RFP Software built to win deals, not just respond faster.
vs
LoopioAI RFP Software Built for the People Behind Every RFP
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
AutoRFP.ai vs Loopio
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Loopio is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 6 versus 0.3 for AutoRFP.ai, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose AutoRFP.ai if…
- You need ISO 27001:2022 certified or SOC 2 Type II audited or UK GDPR compliant or EU Cloud Code of Conduct coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Listed among G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Choose Loopio if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6 vs 0.3)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | AutoRFP.ai | Loopio |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #42 | #15 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 2.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 12 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 46% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AutoRFP.ai 0pp · Loopio 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Loopio leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AutoRFP.aiLoopio
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0AutoRFP.ai ranked higher
1Loopio ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | AutoRFP.ai | Loopio |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #16 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AutoRFP.ai | Loopio |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $899 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud on AWS, hosted in the US (Oregon), EU (Frankfurt) or Australia (Sydney), depending on customer needs. | Cloud-delivered, hosted on Amazon Web Services |
| Integrations | 34+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001:2022 certified, SOC 2 Type II audited, GDPR compliant, UK GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, EU Cloud Code of Conduct | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant |
| Support | Unlimited support on all plans, Online training included, White-glove onboarding, with previous responses imported within 48 hours, Security questions handled at security@autorfp.ai | Onboarding Manager training and setup, Ongoing Customer Success guidance, On-demand learning hub, Phone, email and in-app support |
| Founded | 2022 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Brisbane, Queensland, Australia | Toronto, Canada |
| Employees | 11–50 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Strategic investment from Sumeru Equity Partners |
| Best for | Bid and sales teams that answer high volumes of RFPs, DDQs and security questionnaires, from startups to Fortune 500 companies. | Proposal and bid managers, sales teams, pre-sales, IT and InfoSec, investor relations and marketing teams that answer RFPs, DDQs and security questionnaires. |
Plans side by side
AutoRFP.ai
Scale$899month, paid yearly
Accelerate$1,299month, paid yearly
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AutoRFP.ai
- Listed among G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Loopio
- Centralized reusable content management for RFPs
- Strong for high-volume RFP and security questionnaire responses
- Recognized as a leading enterprise RFP response tool
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AutoRFP.ai vs Loopio”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/autorfp-ai-vs-loopio, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.