Skip to content
SlateIndex
AutoRFP.aiThe agentic AI RFP Software built to win deals, not just respond faster.
vs
LoopioAI RFP Software Built for the People Behind Every RFP
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

AutoRFP.ai vs Loopio

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Loopio is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 6 versus 0.3 for AutoRFP.ai, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose AutoRFP.ai if…

  • You need ISO 27001:2022 certified or SOC 2 Type II audited or UK GDPR compliant or EU Cloud Code of Conduct coverage
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • Listed among G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations

Choose Loopio if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6 vs 0.3)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric AutoRFP.ai Loopio
Visibility score0.3%6%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#42#15
Share of voice0.2%2.2%
Mentions this run112
Positive in AI answers—46%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2AutoRFP.ai 0%

AutoRFP.ai 0pp · Loopio 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Loopio leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0.9%
2.6%
AI Mode
0%
6.7%
Perplexity
0%
8.9%
AutoRFP.aiLoopio

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0AutoRFP.ai ranked higher
1Loopio ranked higher
PromptEngineAutoRFP.aiLoopio
Which Proposals & Contracts vendors do analysts recommend? ChatGPT#16#9

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAutoRFP.aiLoopio
Pricing modelUsage-basedFlat tiers
Entry price$899 / moContact sales
Free planNoNo
DeploymentCloud on AWS, hosted in the US (Oregon), EU (Frankfurt) or Australia (Sydney), depending on customer needs.Cloud-delivered, hosted on Amazon Web Services
Integrations34+—
ComplianceISO 27001:2022 certified, SOC 2 Type II audited, GDPR compliant, UK GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, EU Cloud Code of ConductSOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant
SupportUnlimited support on all plans, Online training included, White-glove onboarding, with previous responses imported within 48 hours, Security questions handled at security@autorfp.aiOnboarding Manager training and setup, Ongoing Customer Success guidance, On-demand learning hub, Phone, email and in-app support
Founded20222014
HeadquartersBrisbane, Queensland, AustraliaToronto, Canada
Employees11–50201–500
FundingBootstrappedStrategic investment from Sumeru Equity Partners
Best forBid and sales teams that answer high volumes of RFPs, DDQs and security questionnaires, from startups to Fortune 500 companies.Proposal and bid managers, sales teams, pre-sales, IT and InfoSec, investor relations and marketing teams that answer RFPs, DDQs and security questionnaires.

Plans side by side

AutoRFP.ai

Scale$899month, paid yearly
Accelerate$1,299month, paid yearly
EnterpriseCustomcustom
AutoRFP.ai pricing

Loopio

FoundationsCustom
EnhancedCustom
EnterpriseCustom
Loopio pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

AutoRFP.ai

  • Listed among G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations

    Loopio

    • Centralized reusable content management for RFPs
    • Strong for high-volume RFP and security questionnaire responses
    • Recognized as a leading enterprise RFP response tool

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “AutoRFP.ai vs Loopio”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/autorfp-ai-vs-loopio, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.