AutoRFP.aiThe agentic AI RFP Software built to win deals, not just respond faster.
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
AutoRFP.ai vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 0.3 for AutoRFP.ai.
Choose AutoRFP.ai if…
- You need ISO 27001:2022 certified or SOC 2 Type II audited or GDPR compliant or UK GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant or EU Cloud Code of Conduct coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Listed among G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 0.3)
- You want a lower entry price ($35 vs $899)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (51–200 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | AutoRFP.ai | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 28.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #42 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 37 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
AutoRFP.ai 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AutoRFP.aiQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0AutoRFP.ai ranked higher
0Qwilr ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | AutoRFP.ai | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | $899 / mo | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud on AWS, hosted in the US (Oregon), EU (Frankfurt) or Australia (Sydney), depending on customer needs. | Web-based, web-native software |
| Integrations | 34+ | — |
| Compliance | ISO 27001:2022 certified, SOC 2 Type II audited, GDPR compliant, UK GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, EU Cloud Code of Conduct | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | Unlimited support on all plans, Online training included, White-glove onboarding, with previous responses imported within 48 hours, Security questions handled at security@autorfp.ai | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2022 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Brisbane, Queensland, Australia | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Bootstrapped | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Bid and sales teams that answer high volumes of RFPs, DDQs and security questionnaires, from startups to Fortune 500 companies. | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
AutoRFP.ai
Scale$899month, paid yearly
Accelerate$1,299month, paid yearly
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
AutoRFP.ai
- Listed among G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “AutoRFP.ai vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/autorfp-ai-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.