AvomaAI Platform for Note-taking, Scheduling & Coaching
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Avoma vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 1.5 versus 0.4 for Avoma.
Choose Avoma if…
- You want a lower entry price ($19 vs $35)
- You need ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or GDPR or HIPAA (Enterprise plan) coverage
- free view-only and collaborator seats
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.5 vs 0.4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 25% positive)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Avoma | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.4% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #39 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Avoma 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
AvomaQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Avoma ranked higher
0Qwilr ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Avoma | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted on AWS in the USA | Web-based, web-native software |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, GDPR, HIPAA (Enterprise plan) | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | Self-service knowledge base, Live chat and email support, Customer Success Manager, Shared Slack channel | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2017 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Palo Alto, California, US | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series A · $15M raised | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Customer-facing sales, success and marketing teams at startups and scaleups | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Avoma
Startup$19recorder seat/month, billed annually ($29 billed monthly)
Organization$29recorder seat/month, billed annually ($39 billed monthly)
Enterprise$39recorder seat/month, billed annually only
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Avoma
- free view-only and collaborator seats
- per-seat pricing for recorder seats
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Avoma vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/avoma-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.