BitwardenOpen source password, passkey and secrets management
vs
CyberArkUnified IAM, PAM, and IGA identity security platform.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3
Bitwarden vs CyberArk
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
CyberArk is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 15.6 versus 5.6 for Bitwarden, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Bitwarden if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO 27001 or SOC 2 Type II or Data Privacy Framework coverage
- Team vaults share app credentials without revealing plaintext passwords
- Recognised as an enterprise-grade option
Choose CyberArk if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15.6 vs 5.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 33% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO 22301 or CSA STAR or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or FedRAMP High or Common Criteria or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or IRAP or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Bitwarden | CyberArk |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.6% | 15.6% |
| Change vs last week | up+3.4% | up+2.1% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #14 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 3% | 6.1% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 19 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 49% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Bitwarden +4.199999999999999pp · CyberArk +0.5pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
CyberArk leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
BitwardenCyberArk
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
0Bitwarden ranked higher
4CyberArk ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Bitwarden | CyberArk |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Identity & Access Management tools in 2026? | AI Mode | #8 | #5 |
| What are the best Identity & Access Management tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #14 | #5 |
| Which identity and access management platform has the best reviews? | AI Mode | #8 | #5 |
| Which identity and access management platform has transparent pricing? | Perplexity | #10 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Bitwarden | CyberArk |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $1.65 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Cloud or self-hosted | Self-hosted and SaaS |
| Compliance | ISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA, GDPR, Data Privacy Framework | SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 22301, CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, FedRAMP High, Common Criteria, PCI DSS v4.0.1, HIPAA, IRAP, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | 24/7 email support, Priority support for paid users, Dedicated engagement success manager, Dedicated onboarding and training | Support contact, Knowledge base, Technical community |
| Founded | 2016 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Santa Barbara, California, USA | Newton, MA, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Growth round led by PSG | Post-IPO debt |
| Best for | Individuals, teams and enterprises wanting an affordable, auditable password manager with self-hosting option | Enterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities. |
Plans side by side
Bitwarden
Free$0forever
Premium$1.65month, billed annually at $19.80
Families$3.99month for up to 6 users, billed annually at $47.88
Teams$4user per month, billed annually
Enterprise$6user per month, billed annually
Custom (large organizations)Customcontact sales
CyberArk
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Bitwarden
- Team vaults share app credentials without revealing plaintext passwords
- Recognised as an enterprise-grade option
CyberArk
- Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
- Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
- Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
- Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
- Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Bitwarden vs CyberArk”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/bitwarden-vs-cyberark, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.