BloomreachThe AI Platform for Personalization
vs
KeapSmall business CRM and automation platform
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Bloomreach vs Keap
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Bloomreach is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 0.9 for Keap.
Choose Bloomreach if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 0.9)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or ISO 9001 or ISO 22301 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Keap if…
- You need more native integrations (5000+ vs 175+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (25% vs 0% positive)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- Straightforward tier-based pricing with no features gated behind higher packages
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Bloomreach | Keap |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.9% | 0.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #27 | #32 |
| Share of voice | 0.7% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 25% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Bloomreach 0pp · Keap 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Bloomreach leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
BloomreachKeap
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Bloomreach ranked higher
0Keap ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Bloomreach | Keap |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $299 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | — | Cloud |
| Integrations | 175+ | 5000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, ISO 9001, ISO 22301, GDPR, CCPA | — |
| Support | In-app chat with a 90-second average response, 24/7, Named Customer Success Manager, Bloomreach Academy, Monthly best-practice sessions | 24/7 chat support, U.S.-based phone support, Dedicated Customer Success Manager, Help center |
| Founded | 2009 | 2001 |
| Headquarters | Mountain View, California, United States | Chandler, Arizona, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series D, from Bain Capital Ventures, Battery Ventures, Lightspeed, NEA and Salesforce Ventures | Debt |
| Best for | Brands at scale that send high volumes of email and SMS, run ecommerce, and hold customer data spread across systems. Most customers invest $60K or more a year. | Growth-focused small businesses such as consultants, marketing agencies, coaches and startups that want marketing and sales automation |
Plans side by side
Bloomreach
Email (ESP)Customyear, custom quote
Marketing AutomationCustomyear, custom quote
Ecommerce SearchCustomyear, custom quote
Marketing AgentCustomyear, custom quote
Shopping AgentCustomyear, custom quote
Loomi ConnectCustomyear, custom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Bloomreach
- included in analyst-backed marketing automation shortlist
Keap
- Straightforward tier-based pricing with no features gated behind higher packages
- Lower effective monthly cost when paying annually
- Suited to growing teams needing workflow automation, custom sales pipelines and advanced reporting
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Bloomreach vs Keap”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/bloomreach-vs-keap, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.