BudibaseBuild AI agents, chat and automate internal workflows instantly.
vs
Claris FileMakerBuild custom apps, automate work, and integrate systems
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Budibase vs Claris FileMaker
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Budibase is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 5.2 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker.
Choose Budibase if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.2 vs 1.6)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
Choose Claris FileMaker if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Budibase | Claris FileMaker |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.2% | 1.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.5% | New |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #20 | #37 |
| Share of voice | 1.6% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Budibase −0.5pp · Claris FileMaker +1.6pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Budibase leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
BudibaseClaris FileMaker
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Budibase ranked higher
0Claris FileMaker ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Budibase | Claris FileMaker |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $19 / mo | $22 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | Self-host on your own infrastructure or use Budibase Cloud | Cloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server) |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 |
| Support | Community forum, docs and chat, Email support on Business plan, Priority SLAs and account manager on Enterprise | Technical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums |
| Founded | 2019 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Belfast, Northern Ireland | Sunnyvale, California |
| Employees | 51–200 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Seed (about $1.8M, before Seed II) · $9M raised | Later Stage VC · $1M raised |
| Best for | IT and operations teams in regulated organizations that want agents, apps and automations they can self-host. | Teams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises |
Plans side by side
Budibase
Pro$19month
Premium$49month
Business$299month
Enterprise (Cloud)Customcustom
Open source$0free (self-host)
Enterprise (Self-host)Customcustom
Claris FileMaker
Starter (Formerly Essentials)$22per user, per month, billed annually
Max (Formerly Standard)$45per user, per month, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Budibase
- open-source, self-hosted deployment
- avoids vendor lock-in and keeps data ownership
- transparent, predictable pricing
- free with no user limit
- low-code tool for internal tools, admin panels and dashboards
Claris FileMaker
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Budibase vs Claris FileMaker”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/budibase-vs-claris-filemaker, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.