Budibase vs Quickbase
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Budibase is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 5.2 versus 4 for Quickbase, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Budibase if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (5.2 vs 4)
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 13% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- open-source, self-hosted deployment
Choose Quickbase if…
- You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or HIPAA Security Rule or DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2 or TX-RAMP Level 2 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Budibase | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 5.2% | 4% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.5% | down−0.4% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #20 | #25 |
| Share of voice | 1.6% | 1.3% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 8 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 13% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Budibase −0.5pp · Quickbase −0.40000000000000036pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Budibase leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Budibase | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alternatives to the most popular low-code platform | Perplexity | #11 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Budibase | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $19 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | Self-host on your own infrastructure or use Budibase Cloud | — |
| Integrations | — | 40+ |
| Compliance | ISO 27001 | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, HIPAA Security Rule, DFARS CSA CCM STAR Level 2, TX-RAMP Level 2 |
| Support | Community forum, docs and chat, Email support on Business plan, Priority SLAs and account manager on Enterprise | Expert support, Partners and services, Active community champions, Training and best practices for a Center of Excellence |
| Founded | 2019 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Belfast, Northern Ireland | Boston, Massachusetts |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Seed (about $1.8M, before Seed II) · $9M raised | Funding round |
| Best for | IT and operations teams in regulated organizations that want agents, apps and automations they can self-host. | Business teams that need custom apps for complex projects, processes and field operations without writing code. |
Plans side by side
Budibase
Quickbase
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Budibase
- open-source, self-hosted deployment
- avoids vendor lock-in and keeps data ownership
- transparent, predictable pricing
- free with no user limit
- low-code tool for internal tools, admin panels and dashboards
Quickbase
- Recognised among established low-code platforms
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Budibase vs Quickbase”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/budibase-vs-quickbase, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.