Claris FileMakerBuild custom apps, automate work, and integrate systems
vs
ZapierBuild and scale AI workflows and agents across 9,000+ apps
Comparison · Low-Code & No-Code · weekly run Nov 3
Claris FileMaker vs Zapier
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Zapier is the stronger AI pick in Low-Code & No-Code: it has a visibility score of 9.9 versus 1.6 for Claris FileMaker.
Choose Claris FileMaker if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27018 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
Choose Zapier if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (9.9 vs 1.6)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Claris FileMaker | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.6% | 9.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | down−0.1% |
| Rank in Low-Code & No-Code | #37 | #11 |
| Share of voice | 0.3% | 2.7% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 15 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 29% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Claris FileMaker +1.6pp · Zapier 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Zapier leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Claris FileMakerZapier
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Claris FileMaker ranked higher
0Zapier ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Claris FileMaker | Zapier |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $22 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $19.99 / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (FileMaker Cloud on AWS) or self-hosted (FileMaker Server) | Multi-tenant cloud |
| Integrations | — | 9000+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27018 | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Technical support from Claris teams, Around-the-clock monitoring by Claris teams, Claris Academy certifications, Online community forums | Email support, Live chat on Professional plans from the 2,000 task tier, Priority support on Team and Enterprise, Technical Account Manager on set thresholds or as an add-on |
| Founded | 2019 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, California | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 201–500 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Later Stage VC · $1M raised | Equity crowdfunding |
| Best for | Teams that want custom business apps built without writing code, from small businesses to large enterprises | Businesses from first-time founders to the Fortune 500 that want AI and automation across many apps. |
Plans side by side
Claris FileMaker
Starter (Formerly Essentials)$22per user, per month, billed annually
Max (Formerly Standard)$45per user, per month, billed annually
Zapier
Free$0month
Professional$19.99month (starting from)
Team$69month (starting from)
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Claris FileMaker
Profile in progress.
Zapier
- Easy to use and integrates with thousands of apps
- Powerful AI agent and workflow automation
- Strong user ratings on G2 and Capterra
- Widely adopted general integration and workflow tool
- Free tier with no time limit or credit card needed
- Free plans have limited monthly activities
- Not a standalone marketing automation platform
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Claris FileMaker vs Zapier”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/claris-filemaker-vs-zapier, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.