ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
PegaThe leading AI-powered platform for enterprise transformation
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs Pega
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Clay is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 0.7 versus 0.6 for Pega.
Choose Clay if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (0.7 vs 0.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 20% positive)
- You need CCPA coverage
Choose Pega if…
- You need SOC 1 Type II or ISO 42001 or ISO 22301:2019 or ISO 9001 or CSA or PCI DSS or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or HITRUST or FedRAMP or HIPAA or IRAP coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Strong fit for workflow automation, RPA, case management, and decisioning
- Named among leading low-code vendors in analyst evaluations
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | Pega |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #65 | #68 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 20% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay 0pp · Pega 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Clay leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayPega
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clay ranked higher
0Pega ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | Pega |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | — |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | — |
| Free plan | Yes | — |
| Deployment | — | Cloud (Pega Cloud, fully managed SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 200+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 42001, ISO 22301:2019, ISO 9001, CSA, PCI DSS, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, HITRUST, GDPR, FedRAMP, HIPAA, IRAP |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | — |
| Founded | 2017 | 1983 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Waltham, Massachusetts, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | IPO |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Large enterprises in regulated industries that need governed workflow automation and decisioning |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
Pega
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
Pega
- Strong fit for workflow automation, RPA, case management, and decisioning
- Named among leading low-code vendors in analyst evaluations
- Recognised as a major enterprise CRM suite provider
- AI-powered decisioning and workflow tools
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs Pega”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-pega, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.