ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
Tray.aiOrchestrate integration, automation, and agents
Comparison · AI Agents · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs Tray.ai
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Tray.ai is the stronger AI pick in AI Agents: it has a visibility score of 1.5 versus 0.7 for Clay.
Choose Clay if…
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose Tray.ai if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.5 vs 0.7)
- You need SOC 1 or SOC 2 or HIPAA coverage
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.7% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in AI Agents | #65 | #50 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay 0pp · Tray.ai 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Tray.ai leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayTray.ai
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clay ranked higher
0Tray.ai ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | Tray.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | — | Tray-managed cloud runtime, with on-premise connectivity and regional hosting on Enterprise plans |
| Integrations | — | 700+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 1, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | Business hours support on all plans, Knowledge base, Community forums, Tray Academy |
| Founded | 2017 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Series C-2 · $164M raised |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Enterprise IT and business teams that need to build integrations, AI agents and governed MCP tools on one platform |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
Tray.ai
ProCustomSized to your needs
TeamCustomSized to your needs
EnterpriseCustomSized to your needs
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
Tray.ai
- Recommended as a cloud-neutral orchestration platform option
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs Tray.ai”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-tray-ai, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.