CloseThe CRM that does the work
vs
G2G2: Innovating Software and Systems that Impact Tomorrow
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
Close vs G2
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
G2 is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 7 versus 2.8 for Close, and ranks ahead in 75% of the answers that name both.
Choose Close if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
Choose G2 if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7 vs 2.8)
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Close | G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 7% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | New |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #26 | #14 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 1.4% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 9 |
| Positive in AI answers | 52% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Close −0.5pp · G2 +7pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
G2 leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CloseG2
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
1Close ranked higher
3G2 ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Close | G2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Sales Engagement tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #9 | #11 |
| Which sales engagement platform has the best reviews? | Perplexity | #5 | #2 |
| Which Sales Engagement tools offer annual discounts? | AI Mode | #6 | #4 |
| Which Sales Engagement tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #9 | #2 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Close | G2 |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | — |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | — |
| Support | Knowledge base, Email support | — |
| Founded | 2013 | 1989 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | San Diego, California, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Angel | — |
| Best for | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS | — |
Plans side by side
Close
Solo$19per user / month (billed monthly; $9 billed annually)
Essentials$49per user / month (billed monthly; $35 billed annually)
Growth$109per user / month (billed monthly; $99 billed annually)
Scale$149per user / month (billed monthly; $139 billed annually)
G2
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
G2
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Close vs G2”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/close-vs-g2, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.