Close vs Salesloft
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Salesloft is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 51.2 versus 2.8 for Close, and ranks ahead in 67% of the answers that name both.
Choose Close if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (52% vs 34% positive)
- You need GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
Choose Salesloft if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (51.2 vs 2.8)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 coverage
- Enterprise-grade cadence management and revenue orchestration
- Deep revenue intelligence and forecasting via Clari integration
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Close | Salesloft |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 51.2% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | up+1.4% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #26 | #3 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 10.1% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 61 |
| Positive in AI answers | 52% | 34% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Close −0.5pp · Salesloft +1.4000000000000057pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Salesloft leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
6 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Close | Salesloft |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do companies run outbound sales sequences without a dedicated tool? | ChatGPT | #9 | #2 |
| What are the best Sales Engagement tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #9 | #2 |
| Which sales engagement platform has the best reviews? | Perplexity | #5 | #6 |
| Which sales engagement platform has transparent pricing? | AI Mode | #3 | #1 |
| Which Sales Engagement tools offer annual discounts? | AI Mode | #6 | #5 |
| Which Sales Engagement tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #9 | #13 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Close | Salesloft |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud (XaaS-only) |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701 |
| Support | Knowledge base, Email support | — |
| Founded | 2013 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | Atlanta, GA |
| Employees | 51–200 | — |
| Funding | Angel | Series F · $246M raised |
| Best for | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS | — |
Plans side by side
Close
Salesloft
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
Salesloft
- Enterprise-grade cadence management and revenue orchestration
- Deep revenue intelligence and forecasting via Clari integration
- Widely recognized top enterprise choice and gold standard
- Strong pipeline visibility and coaching for rep productivity
- Sales execution with structured sequencing
- Pricing not publicly listed; requires sales quote
- Requires annual contracts and minimum seats
- Expensive, overly complex, and slow to configure for startups
- No free plan or self-service free trial
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Close vs Salesloft”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/close-vs-salesloft, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.