ConcordContract Management You Don't Have to Manage
vs
ResponsiveResponsive AI powers bids, questionnaires, and trust centers with insight, accuracy, and speed.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Concord vs Responsive
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Responsive is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 10.7 versus 3.6 for Concord.
Choose Concord if…
- You want a lower entry price ($499 vs $10,000)
- You need more native integrations (5000+ vs 32+)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions or CSA STAR Level One coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
Choose Responsive if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.7 vs 3.6)
- You need AICPA SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CCPA or STAR Level 1 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Concord | Responsive |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.6% | 10.7% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #20 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 1.1% | 4% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 20 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Concord 0pp · Responsive 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Responsive leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ConcordResponsive
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Concord ranked higher
0Responsive ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Concord | Responsive |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $499 per seat / mo | $10,000 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | Cloud-based | Flexible hosting options |
| Integrations | 5000+ | 32+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework with UK and Swiss extensions, GDPR, CSA STAR Level One | GDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1 |
| Support | Self-serve knowledge base, Email support, Live training webinars, Priority customer support | Professional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions |
| Founded | 2014 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, US | Frisco, Texas, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $39M raised | Round led by Elevate Capital |
| Best for | Mid-sized companies in healthcare, tech, professional services and financial services, especially those where business teams create and track contracts outside legal. | Dedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations. |
Plans side by side
Concord
Essentials$499month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Business$899month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Enterprise$1,299month (paid annually), includes 5 users
Responsive
Emerging Edition$10,000year (starting from, platform fee)
Growth EditionCustomyear
Enterprise EditionCustomyear
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Concord
- free contract-focused tier with unlimited contracts and e-signatures
- less proposal-oriented
Responsive
- Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
- Designed for complex enterprise responses
- Top pick for RFP response management
- Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
- Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Concord vs Responsive”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/concord-vs-responsive, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.