Skip to content
SlateIndex
Conga CLMCommerce, Lined Up.
vs
ResponsiveResponsive AI powers bids, questionnaires, and trust centers with insight, accuracy, and speed.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

Conga CLM vs Responsive

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Responsive is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 10.7 versus 7.3 for Conga CLM, and ranks ahead in 38% of the answers that name both.

Choose Conga CLM if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 33% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA or EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • Enterprise-grade document generation, CPQ, and contract lifecycle management

Choose Responsive if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.7 vs 7.3)
  • You need GDPR or AICPA SOC 2 or ISO 42001 or CCPA or STAR Level 1 coverage
  • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
  • Designed for complex enterprise responses

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Conga CLM Responsive
Visibility score7.3%10.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#13#10
Share of voice2.5%4%
Mentions this run1320
Positive in AI answers67%33%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Conga CLM 7%

Conga CLM 0pp · Responsive 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Responsive leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
8%
3%
AI Mode
9.3%
15.7%
Perplexity
4.8%
13.3%
Conga CLMResponsive

Head to head in AI answers

8 engine answers name both brands

5Conga CLM ranked higher
3Responsive ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionConga CLMResponsive
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—$10,000 / mo
Free plan—No
DeploymentFlexible deployment optionsFlexible hosting options
Integrations—32+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, HIPAA, EU-U.S. Data Privacy FrameworkGDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1
Support—Professional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions
Founded20062015
HeadquartersHouston, Texas, United StatesFrisco, Texas, United States
Employees1,001–5,000501–1,000
FundingVenture round led by Insight Venture Partners and Salesforce VenturesRound led by Elevate Capital
Best forLarge enterprises and high-growth businesses whose commercial complexity across sales, legal, finance and IT is high.Dedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations.

Plans side by side

Conga CLM

Pricing not available.

Responsive

Emerging Edition$10,000year (starting from, platform fee)
Growth EditionCustomyear
Enterprise EditionCustomyear
Responsive pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Conga CLM

  • Enterprise-grade document generation, CPQ, and contract lifecycle management
  • Deep integration with CRM ecosystems and Salesforce
  • Suited to complex sales cycles and complex, multi-layered agreement workflows
  • Stronger choice for broader contract and agreement management
  • Proposal generation integrated with broader CRM and document workflows

    Responsive

    • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
    • Designed for complex enterprise responses
    • Top pick for RFP response management
    • Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
    • Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Conga CLM vs Responsive”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/conga-clm-vs-responsive, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.