Conga CPQProposals & Contracts
vs
OneflowSmart contracts that feel like magic.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Conga CPQ vs Oneflow
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Oneflow is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 16.1 versus 0.3 for Conga CPQ, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Conga CPQ if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 32% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27701 or PCI DSS or HIPAA coverage
- handles complex products, pricing, discounts, configuration and approval rules
Choose Oneflow if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (16.1 vs 0.3)
- You need ISO 9001 or ISO 14001 or SOC 1 Type 1 or SOC 2 Type 1 coverage
- Dynamic, collaborative digital contracts that stay editable after sending
- Live contract editing and negotiation, reducing email back-and-forth
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Conga CPQ | Oneflow |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 16.1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #44 | #7 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 4.9% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 27 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 32% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Conga CPQ 0pp · Oneflow 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Oneflow leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Conga CPQOneflow
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Conga CPQ ranked higher
1Oneflow ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Conga CPQ | Oneflow |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | Perplexity | #12 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Conga CPQ | Oneflow |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Cloud SaaS, mainly as a Salesforce-native application | SaaS |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, PCI DSS, HIPAA | ISO 27001, ISO 9001, ISO 14001, SOC 1 Type 1, SOC 2 Type 1 |
| Support | — | Dedicated onboarding in the Enterprise tier |
| Founded | 2006 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Houston, Texas | Stockholm, Sweden |
| Employees | — | 51–200 |
| Funding | Round led by Insight Venture Partners and Salesforce Ventures | Private investment of SEK 20 million from Mattias Ståhlgren |
| Best for | Mid-market and enterprise buyers | Teams of all shapes and sizes that need to handle their contracts |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Conga CPQ
- handles complex products, pricing, discounts, configuration and approval rules
Oneflow
- Dynamic, collaborative digital contracts that stay editable after sending
- Live contract editing and negotiation, reducing email back-and-forth
- Free tier with basic contract management, comments, audit trails and dashboards
- Proposal-to-contract workflow turning interactive proposals into live contracts
- Strong for contract management, with online signing and post-signature tracking
- Interactive proposals and editable contracts require a paid plan
- Smaller review coverage and pricing generally targets larger teams
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Conga CPQ vs Oneflow”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/conga-cpq-vs-oneflow, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.