Conga CPQ vs Upland Qvidian
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Upland Qvidian is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 1 versus 0.3 for Conga CPQ, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Conga CPQ if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (100% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or PCI DSS or HIPAA coverage
- handles complex products, pricing, discounts, configuration and approval rules
Choose Upland Qvidian if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1 vs 0.3)
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
- Suited to large-scale content reuse
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Conga CPQ | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 1% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #44 | #38 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 100% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Conga CPQ 0pp · Upland Qvidian 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Upland Qvidian leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Conga CPQ | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | Perplexity | #12 | #11 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Conga CPQ | Upland Qvidian |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Cloud SaaS, mainly as a Salesforce-native application | Cloud, hosted on Amazon Web Services |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, PCI DSS, HIPAA | SOC 2 Type II |
| Founded | 2006 | — |
| Headquarters | Houston, Texas | Austin, Texas |
| Employees | — | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Round led by Insight Venture Partners and Salesforce Ventures | Series B · $31M raised |
| Best for | Mid-market and enterprise buyers | Sales teams that respond to RFPs and build sales proposals |
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Conga CPQ
- handles complex products, pricing, discounts, configuration and approval rules
Upland Qvidian
- Enterprise-oriented for structured proposal and RFP processes
- Recommended for formal RFPs and security questionnaires
- Suited to large-scale content reuse
- Included in G2's 2026 RFP software recommendations
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Conga CPQ vs Upland Qvidian”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/conga-cpq-vs-upland-qvidian, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.