Consensus vs Outreach
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Outreach is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 8 versus 4 for Consensus, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Consensus if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (29% vs 28% positive)
- You need GDPR or CCPA coverage
- Strong ratings and reviews for sales enablement
- Well suited to buyer collaboration and self-guided evaluation
Choose Outreach if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8 vs 4)
- You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or HIPAA or CSA STAR coverage
- Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform
- Deep workflow controls and granular sequence analytics
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Consensus | Outreach |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4% | 8% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #18 | #12 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 2.3% |
| Mentions this run | 7 | 13 |
| Positive in AI answers | 29% | 28% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Consensus 0pp · Outreach 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Outreach leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Consensus | Outreach |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Sales Enablement tools in 2026? | ChatGPT | #10 | #9 |
| Which Sales Enablement vendors do analysts recommend? | Perplexity | #12 | #10 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Consensus | Outreach |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | Contact sales |
| Free plan | — | No |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, HIPAA, CSA STAR |
| Support | — | Plus support included with Amplify Core, Managed services included with Amplify Pro, Technical account management and enterprise support, Professional services packages for onboarding |
| Founded | 2013 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | — | Seattle, Washington |
| Employees | — | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Investment from Sumeru Equity Partners | Series G · $489M raised |
| Best for | Revenue teams in presales, sales, marketing, customer success and channel that want buyers to view product demos on their own terms. | Revenue teams, from SDRs and account executives to sales managers, RevOps and customer success, that want prospecting, deal management, coaching and forecasting in one platform. |
Plans side by side
Consensus
Pricing not available.
Outreach
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Consensus
- Strong ratings and reviews for sales enablement
- Well suited to buyer collaboration and self-guided evaluation
- Powerful platform for buyer-facing demos and engagement
- Publicly documented discounts are easy to find
- Generally a poor fit for early startups
Outreach
- Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform
- Deep workflow controls and granular sequence analytics
- Recognized as an enterprise leader by analysts
- Strong multi-channel sequencing, AI-guided selling and forecasting
- Quote-based pricing with no public prices
- Heavy and complex, slow to configure
- Annual contracts with minimum seat counts
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Consensus vs Outreach”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/consensus-vs-outreach, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.