Skip to content
SlateIndex
ContractbookHelping businesses scale with future-proof contracts
vs
ResponsiveResponsive AI powers bids, questionnaires, and trust centers with insight, accuracy, and speed.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

Contractbook vs Responsive

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Responsive is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 10.7 versus 0.6 for Contractbook.

Choose Contractbook if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or eIDAS coverage

Choose Responsive if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (10.7 vs 0.6)
  • You need AICPA SOC 2 or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CCPA or STAR Level 1 coverage
  • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
  • Designed for complex enterprise responses

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Contractbook Responsive
Visibility score0.6%10.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#41#10
Share of voice0.2%4%
Mentions this run120
Positive in AI answers—33%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Contractbook 1%

Contractbook 0pp · Responsive 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Responsive leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
3%
AI Mode
0%
15.7%
Perplexity
1.7%
13.3%
ContractbookResponsive

Head to head in AI answers

0 engine answers name both brands

0Contractbook ranked higher
0Responsive ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionContractbookResponsive
Pricing modelFlat tiersFlat tiers
Entry priceContact sales$10,000 / mo
Free planYesNo
Deployment—Flexible hosting options
Integrations—32+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, GDPR, eIDASGDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1
SupportLive chat, Email, Phone support, Help CentreProfessional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions
Founded—2015
Headquarters—Frisco, Texas, United States
Employees—501–1,000
FundingSeries B · $44M raisedRound led by Elevate Capital
Best forSmall and growing companies that handle high volumes of low-complexity contractsDedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations.

Plans side by side

Contractbook

EssentialCustommonth, billed annually
CentralizeCustommonth, billed annually
AccelerateCustommonth, billed annually
CustomCustom
Contractbook pricing

Responsive

Emerging Edition$10,000year (starting from, platform fee)
Growth EditionCustomyear
Enterprise EditionCustomyear
Responsive pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Contractbook

Profile in progress.

Responsive

  • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
  • Designed for complex enterprise responses
  • Top pick for RFP response management
  • Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
  • Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Contractbook vs Responsive”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/contractbook-vs-responsive, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.