Skip to content
SlateIndex
GreenhouseThe Orchestrated Hiring Ecosystem for the AI era
vs
SeekOutThe agentic AI recruiting platform that runs on your terms
Comparison · Recruiting · weekly run Nov 3

Greenhouse vs SeekOut

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Greenhouse is the stronger AI pick in Recruiting: it has a visibility score of 38.5 versus 5.3 for SeekOut, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Greenhouse if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (38.5 vs 5.3)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (56% vs 25% positive)
  • You need ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or CCPA/CPRA or PCI DSS coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)

Choose SeekOut if…

  • You need CCPA or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO/IEC 23894:2023 coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
  • Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
  • Strong for sourcing passive talent

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Greenhouse SeekOut
Visibility score38.5%5.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Recruiting#1#18
Share of voice8.1%1.9%
Mentions this run4311
Positive in AI answers56%25%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 3Greenhouse 39%

Greenhouse 0pp · SeekOut 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Greenhouse leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
43.5%
7.8%
AI Mode
33.5%
3.7%
Perplexity
38.3%
4.4%
GreenhouseSeekOut

Head to head in AI answers

7 engine answers name both brands

7Greenhouse ranked higher
0SeekOut ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGreenhouseSeekOut
Pricing modelFlat tiersPer seat
Entry priceContact sales$149 per seat / mo
Free planNoNo · 14-day trial
Deployment—Cloud, hosted on Microsoft Azure
ComplianceSOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 42001:2023, GDPR, CCPA/CPRA, PCI DSSSOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO/IEC 23894:2023
Support—Help center and trainings, Dedicated customer success on higher plans, Dedicated integration and onboarding, White-glove implementation on the full plan
Founded20122017
HeadquartersNew York City, NY, United StatesBellevue, WA, United States
Employees501–1,00051–200
FundingSeries D · $110M raisedSeries C · $189M raised
Best forEmployers that want structured, automated hiring across sourcing, interviews and the ATS, from early-stage companies to global enterprisesSolo sourcers and teams starting with dedicated recruiting seats, up to enterprises running the full recruiting funnel

Plans side by side

Greenhouse

CoreCustom
PlusCustom
ProCustom
Greenhouse pricing

SeekOut

SeekOut Sourcing Core (Recruit Core)$149per seat per month, billed annually; $179/mo billed monthly
SeekOut Sourcing (Recruit)Customper seat, custom, billed annually
SeekOut Sourcing + Integration (Recruit)Customcustom packages by team size, billed annually
SeekOut Full Recruiting Funnel (Recruit)Customcustom, billed annually
SeekOut pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Greenhouse

  • Strong structured hiring and interview scorecards
  • Strong reporting and data visibility
  • Top ratings and popularity for enterprise and mid-market recruiting
  • Integration ecosystem and unified data
  • Reduces hiring bias and supports compliance

    SeekOut

    • Free trial with unlimited AI-powered profile searches
    • Strong for sourcing passive talent
    • Per-recruiter cost may be high relative to alternatives

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Greenhouse vs SeekOut”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/greenhouse-vs-seekout, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.