Skip to content
SlateIndex
GrowthBookThe warehouse-native platform for experimentation, feature flags, and product analytics
vs
HeapBetter Insights. Faster.
Comparison · Product Analytics · weekly run Nov 3

GrowthBook vs Heap

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Heap is the stronger AI pick in Product Analytics: it has a visibility score of 36.1 versus 3 for GrowthBook, and ranks ahead in 75% of the answers that name both.

Choose GrowthBook if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 15% positive)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need GDPR or CCPA or COPPA or HIPAA coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based

Choose Heap if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (36.1 vs 3)
  • You need GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant or ISO 27701 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 coverage
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
  • Automatic event capture (autocapture)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric GrowthBook Heap
Visibility score3%36.1%
Change vs last weekup+1.1%up+9.1%
Rank in Product Analytics#14#4
Share of voice1.2%11.1%
Mentions this run652
Positive in AI answers33%15%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3GrowthBook 3%

GrowthBook +1.1pp · Heap +9.100000000000001pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Heap leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
2.4%
43%
AI Mode
3.7%
31.3%
Perplexity
3%
34.1%
GrowthBookHeap

Head to head in AI answers

4 engine answers name both brands

1GrowthBook ranked higher
3Heap ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionGrowthBookHeap
Pricing modelPer seatUsage-based
Entry priceFree; paid from $40 per seat / moContact sales
Free planYesYes
DeploymentGrowthBook Cloud hosted on AWS, or self-hosted on your own infrastructure, including air-gapped and on-prem deployments.Cloud-based; deployment starts by installing a free tracking snippet on the site
Integrations—100+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA, COPPA, HIPAASOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, ISO 27018
SupportCommunity support, Email and in-app premium support on Pro, Dedicated team support channel and training on EnterpriseEmail support, Standard support, Dedicated customer success manager (Premier), Heap Community
Founded2020—
HeadquartersPalo Alto, California, United States—
Employees11–50—
FundingSeries A · $23M raisedSeries D · $205M raised
Best forProduct, engineering and data teams that want experimentation, feature flags and product analytics on their own data warehouse, with an option to self-host.Product and growth teams that want complete user behavior data without engineering-led event tagging

Plans side by side

GrowthBook

Starter (Cloud)$0month
Pro (Cloud)$40seat / month
Enterprise (Cloud)Customcustom
Open Source (Self-Hosted)$0month
Enterprise (Self-Hosted)Customcustom
GrowthBook pricing

Heap

Free$0month, up to 10k monthly sessions
GrowthCustomestimate after installing snippet
ProCustomcustom session pricing
PremierCustomcustom session pricing
Heap pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

GrowthBook

  • Strong for experimentation and warehouse-based metrics
  • Engineering control and warehouse ownership
  • Pricing transparency
  • Measures statistical impact of feature flags and experiments

    Heap

    • Automatic event capture (autocapture)
    • Retroactive analysis without a predefined tracking plan
    • Reduced manual instrumentation and faster implementation
    • Links product analytics with UX and digital-experience analytics
    • Free tier available
    • Paid pricing largely quote-based, not published
    • Free plan limited to about 10,000 monthly sessions

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “GrowthBook vs Heap”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/growthbook-vs-heap, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.