HarvestEveryone's time is valuable. We help teams spend it wisely.
vs
WrikeThe work delivery platform for people and AI
Comparison · Project Management · weekly run Nov 3
Harvest vs Wrike
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Wrike is the stronger AI pick in Project Management: it has a visibility score of 13.5 versus 2.7 for Harvest, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Harvest if…
- You want a lower entry price ($9 vs $10)
- You need PCI-DSS Merchant Certificate coverage
Choose Wrike if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (13.5 vs 2.7)
- You need more native integrations (400+ vs 40+)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001:2013 or ISO 27018:2019 or CSA STAR or GDPR-compliant or CCPA-compliant coverage
- Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Harvest | Wrike |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.7% | 13.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Project Management | #29 | #8 |
| Share of voice | 0.7% | 4.4% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 26 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Harvest 0pp · Wrike 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Wrike leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HarvestWrike
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
1Harvest ranked higher
0Wrike ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Harvest | Wrike |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a project management tool integrate with? | Perplexity | #4 | #9 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Harvest | Wrike |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $9 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $10 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Cloud-only; data is hosted in Paris, France for European sign-ups and in Santa Clara, California for other accounts |
| Integrations | 40+ | 400+ |
| Compliance | PCI-DSS Merchant Certificate | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001:2013, ISO 27018:2019, CSA STAR, GDPR-compliant, CCPA-compliant |
| Support | Help Center, Scheduled phone support on Teams and Enterprise plans, Dedicated Customer Success Manager on Enterprise Plus | Professional services and deployment consultancy, Premium support |
| Founded | 2006 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | — | San Diego, California, US |
| Employees | — | 1,001–5,000 |
| Funding | Seed | Series B |
| Best for | Freelancers and professional services teams that bill clients by the hour, from solo users to larger teams. | Enterprises that want AI agents and work management under governed controls at scale |
Plans side by side
Harvest
Free$0forever, 1 seat
Teams$9per seat per month, billed annually
Enterprise$14per seat per month, billed annually
Enterprise PlusCustomcustom pricing
Wrike
Free$0user/month
Team$10user/month
Business$25user/month
PinnacleCustomcustom pricing
ApexCustomcustom pricing
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Harvest
Profile in progress.
Wrike
- Multi-department project tracking, time tracking, and customizable workflows
- Request forms, proofing, workload planning, and approvals for creative agencies
- Portfolio controls and risk management for large organizations
- Enterprise-scale planning and reporting
- Managing several complex projects with resource allocation and PMO governance
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Harvest vs Wrike”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/harvest-vs-wrike, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.