HeapBetter Insights. Faster.
vs
PirschPrivacy-friendly, cookie-free Google Analytics alternative
Comparison · Web Analytics · weekly run Nov 2
Heap vs Pirsch
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Heap is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 1.9 for Pirsch.
Choose Heap if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 1.9)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 coverage
- Automatic event capture (autocapture)
Choose Pirsch if…
- You need GDPR or CCPA or PECR or Schrems II coverage
- low starting price
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Heap | Pirsch |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.3% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #20 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 1.8% | 0.5% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | 15% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Heap 0pp · Pirsch 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Heap leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HeapPirsch
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Heap ranked higher
0Pirsch ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Heap | Pirsch |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $6 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-based; deployment starts by installing a free tracking snippet on the site | Cloud hosted in Germany, with on-premise installation available on the Enterprise plan |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, ISO 27018 | GDPR, CCPA, PECR, Schrems II |
| Support | Email support, Standard support, Dedicated customer success manager (Premier), Heap Community | Community forum, Email support, Priority support on Plus plan, Dedicated support on Enterprise plan |
| Founded | — | 2019 |
| Headquarters | — | Rheda-Wiedenbrück, Germany |
| Employees | — | 1–10 |
| Funding | Series D · $205M raised | Bootstrapped |
| Best for | Product and growth teams that want complete user behavior data without engineering-led event tagging | Small businesses, freelancers and agencies that want simple, privacy-friendly analytics without cookie banners |
Plans side by side
Heap
Free$0month, up to 10k monthly sessions
GrowthCustomestimate after installing snippet
ProCustomcustom session pricing
PremierCustomcustom session pricing
Pirsch
Standard$6month (10,000 monthly page views)
Plus$12month (10,000 monthly page views)
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Heap
- Automatic event capture (autocapture)
- Retroactive analysis without a predefined tracking plan
- Reduced manual instrumentation and faster implementation
- Links product analytics with UX and digital-experience analytics
- Free tier available
- Paid pricing largely quote-based, not published
- Free plan limited to about 10,000 monthly sessions
Pirsch
- low starting price
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Heap vs Pirsch”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/heap-vs-pirsch, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.