Skip to content
SlateIndex

Pirsch alternatives

New

Privacy-friendly, cookie-free Google Analytics alternative

Web AnalyticsRheda-Wiedenbrück, Germany1–10 employeesFounded 2019

Visibility score
1.9%
New vs last week
Weekly run · Nov 2

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Alternatives · updated Nov 2, 2026

Pirsch alternatives: top competitors compared

Pirsch has a visibility score of 1.9 in Web Analytics, #26 of 45. AI answers that name Pirsch most often also name these 4.

Quick reference

AlternativeBest forStarting priceVisibilityKey differentiator
PlausibleWebsite owners and teams who find Google Analytics more complex than they need—31.7%No cookies and no personal data collection, so no cookie banner or consent is needed
Fathom AnalyticsEuropean companies and agencies that want website analytics without cookies or personal data collection.$15 / mo14.6%Cookieless, anonymous pageview tracking that collects no personal data, so no consent banner is required for analytics.
UmamiDevelopers, marketers, agencies, startups and teams that want privacy-first analytics without a cookie bannerFree; paid from $20 / mo8.4%Privacy-first analytics that works without cookies or personal data collection and can be fully self-hosted as open source
Google Analytics——68.6%—

Plausible suits website owners and teams who find Google Analytics more complex than they need.

Quick facts

  • Pricing not available
  • 31.7% visibility score · #3 in Web Analytics

Key features

  • Plausible Analytics (cloud) — Managed, EU-hosted, privacy-friendly web analytics with goals, funnels, Search Console and campaign tracking.
  • Community Edition — Open-source, self-hosted version of Plausible.
  • White-label web analytics — Lets SaaS platforms embed the Plausible dashboard under their own brand.

Plausible vs Pirsch

DimensionPlausiblePirsch
Visibility score31.7%1.9%
Pricing model—Usage-based
Entry price—$6 / mo
Free plan—No
Trial—30-day free trial

Pros

  • Lightweight, privacy-friendly analytics
  • Transparent, publicly listed pricing
  • Simple dashboard and reporting
  • Affordable starting price
  • Free trial without a credit card

Cons

  • Less review data available
Full Plausible vs Pirsch comparison

Fathom Analytics suits european companies and agencies that want website analytics without cookies or personal data collection..

Quick facts

  • $15 / mo · usage-based
  • 7-day free trial
  • 14.6% visibility score · #8 in Web Analytics

Key features

  • Fathom Analytics — Privacy-focused website analytics with cookieless tracking, custom events, UTM campaign tracking, email reports, and an analytics API.

Fathom Analytics vs Pirsch

DimensionFathom AnalyticsPirsch
Visibility score14.6%1.9%
Pricing modelUsage-basedUsage-based
Entry price$15 / mo$6 / mo
Free planNoNo
Trial7-day free trial30-day free trial

Pros

  • privacy-focused, cookie-free analytics
  • simple dashboard and simple metrics
  • fast and reliable
  • predictable flat-rate pricing based on pageviews
  • lightweight tool suited to small sites

Cons

    Full Fathom Analytics vs Pirsch comparison

    Umami suits developers, marketers, agencies, startups and teams that want privacy-first analytics without a cookie banner.

    Quick facts

    • Free; paid from $20 / mo · usage-based
    • Free plan available
    • 8.4% visibility score · #11 in Web Analytics

    Key features

    • Umami — Open-source web and product analytics platform with traffic, funnel, retention, journey and revenue reports
    • Umami Cloud — Managed hosting of Umami with email reports and a streaming API, offered on paid plans
    • Umami MCP server — Read-only server that lets AI assistants query Umami analytics, on Cloud Pro and above and self-hosted v3.4 or later

    Umami vs Pirsch

    DimensionUmamiPirsch
    Visibility score8.4%1.9%
    Pricing modelUsage-basedUsage-based
    Entry priceFree; paid from $20 / mo$6 / mo
    Free planYesNo
    TrialFree plan available30-day free trial

    Pros

    • Lightweight, open-source, privacy-focused analytics
    • Free hosted tier or free self-hosted option
    • Affordable and reliable web analytics
    • Simple to use for everyday traffic reporting
    • Strong choice for self-hosting and control

    Cons

      Full Umami vs Pirsch comparison

      Google Analytics is ranked #1 in Web Analytics.

      Quick facts

      • Pricing not available
      • 68.6% visibility score · #1 in Web Analytics

      Key features

      • Google Analytics (GA4) — Web and mobile app traffic analytics with an event-based data model and machine-learning features.
      • Google Analytics 360 — Paid enterprise tier that bundles Analytics with Tag Manager, Optimize, Data Studio, Surveys, Attribution, and Audience Center.

      Google Analytics vs Pirsch

      DimensionGoogle AnalyticsPirsch
      Visibility score68.6%1.9%
      Pricing model—Usage-based
      Entry price—$6 / mo
      Free plan—No
      Trial—30-day free trial

      Pros

      • Free for standard web analytics use
      • Industry standard and most widely used web analytics tool
      • Useful for web traffic, acquisition and marketing attribution
      • Integrates with Google Search Console, Google Ads and BigQuery
      • Shows organic traffic, conversions and revenue from search

      Cons

      • Not well suited to in-app product behaviour analytics
      • Complexity, data sampling and privacy compliance hurdles
      • Pageview-centric model outgrown by growing products
      Full Google Analytics vs Pirsch comparison

      How to choose

      Match the pricing model to your cost driver: headcount, usage or features.

      PlatformPricing modelStarting price
      PirschUsage-based$6 / mo
      Plausible——
      Fathom AnalyticsUsage-based$15 / mo
      UmamiUsage-basedFree; paid from $20 / mo
      Google Analytics——

      More alternatives

      Ranked by how often AI answers name them alongside Pirsch in the latest weekly run.

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Pirsch AI visibility profile”, https://slateindex.ai/brand/pirsch, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.