Heap vs Simple Analytics
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Simple Analytics is the stronger AI pick in Web Analytics: it has a visibility score of 4.3 versus 3.3 for Heap, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Heap if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or GDPR compliant or CCPA compliant or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 coverage
- Automatic event capture (autocapture)
- Retroactive analysis without a predefined tracking plan
- Reduced manual instrumentation and faster implementation
Choose Simple Analytics if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4.3 vs 3.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (17% vs 15% positive)
- You need GDPR compliant (vendor states) coverage
- simple pricing
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Heap | Simple Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.3% | 4.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Web Analytics | #20 | #19 |
| Share of voice | 1.8% | 1.4% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 7 |
| Positive in AI answers | 15% | 17% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Heap 0pp · Simple Analytics 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Simple Analytics leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Heap | Simple Analytics |
|---|---|---|---|
| Official website of the top web analytics tool vendors | ChatGPT | #8 | #13 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Heap | Simple Analytics |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $20 / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud-based; deployment starts by installing a free tracking snippet on the site | SaaS, with data stored and processed in the Netherlands (EU) |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR compliant, CCPA compliant, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 27017, ISO 27018 | GDPR compliant (vendor states) |
| Support | Email support, Standard support, Dedicated customer success manager (Premier), Heap Community | Contact form, Demo booking, Assisted 30-day proof of concept alongside GA4 |
| Founded | — | 2018 |
| Headquarters | — | Amsterdam, Netherlands |
| Employees | — | 1–10 |
| Funding | Series D · $205M raised | Other Investors (Web3 Foundation grant program), undated |
| Best for | Product and growth teams that want complete user behavior data without engineering-led event tagging | Teams that need pageviews without consent banners or personal data, and analysts who want an independent traffic count next to GA4. |
Plans side by side
Heap
Simple Analytics
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Heap
- Automatic event capture (autocapture)
- Retroactive analysis without a predefined tracking plan
- Reduced manual instrumentation and faster implementation
- Links product analytics with UX and digital-experience analytics
- Free tier available
- Paid pricing largely quote-based, not published
- Free plan limited to about 10,000 monthly sessions
Simple Analytics
- simple pricing
- annual plan savings and free months
- privacy-friendly analytics
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Heap vs Simple Analytics”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/heap-vs-simple-analytics, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.