HelplyThe complete AI-native support platform, rebuilt around agents that investigate, resolve, and take action.
vs
MixmaxTurn Your Outreach Into Relationships
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
Helply vs Mixmax
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Mixmax is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 8.5 versus 1.5 for Helply, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Helply if…
- You need more native integrations (60+ vs 40+)
- Budget-friendly alternative
- Native Salesforce integration
- Strong Forrester Leader evaluation
Choose Mixmax if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8.5 vs 1.5)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 0% positive)
- You need SOC 3 or CPRA or HIPAA (BAA available) or Google verified for OAuth and API security coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Helply | Mixmax |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.5% | 8.5% |
| Change vs last week | down−1.9% | up+0.1% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #34 | #11 |
| Share of voice | 0.7% | 2.5% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 17 |
| Positive in AI answers | 0% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Helply −2pp · Mixmax +0.09999999999999964pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Mixmax leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HelplyMixmax
Head to head in AI answers
3 engine answers name both brands
0Helply ranked higher
3Mixmax ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Helply | Mixmax |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Sales Engagement tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #12 | #8 |
| Alternatives to the most popular sales engagement platform | Perplexity | #15 | #7 |
| Which sales engagement platform has transparent pricing? | Perplexity | #8 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Helply | Mixmax |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $49 / mo | Free; paid from $29 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud | Chrome extension inside Gmail, with Outlook support and a web app |
| Integrations | 60+ | 40+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, GDPR, CPRA, HIPAA (BAA available), Google verified for OAuth and API security |
| Support | — | Live chat with the Mixmax team, Sales contact for larger teams |
| Founded | 2025 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Newport, Rhode Island, United States | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 11–50 | 51–200 |
| Funding | — | Series A |
| Best for | SaaS, ecommerce, marketplace and consumer app teams whose support volume is growing faster than their team. | Individual sellers, founders, consultants and teams that do outbound outreach and want to work from Gmail, from solo users to larger sales teams |
Plans side by side
Helply
Credits$49month (500 credits block; larger blocks priced higher)
EnterpriseCustom
Mixmax
I follow up now and then (50 recipients a month)$0user/month
I reach out every week (100 recipients a month)$29user/month, billed yearly
Outreach is my job (1,500 recipients a month)$89user/month, billed yearly
We run outreach at scale (3,000 recipients a month)$129user/month, billed yearly
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Helply
- Budget-friendly alternative
- Native Salesforce integration
- Strong Forrester Leader evaluation
- Strong adoption among enterprise account executives
- Recommended for Salesforce-centric teams
- No published pricing; custom quote required
Mixmax
- Strong fit for Gmail and Google Workspace teams
- Lightweight email sequences and engagement tracking
- Offers a free tier
- Attractive for Salesforce-oriented sales teams
- Named among top recommendations for sales engagement
- Free tier limited to about 50 sequence recipients per month
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Helply vs Mixmax”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/helply-vs-mixmax, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.