Skip to content
SlateIndex
ApolloThe AI GTM System for Go-to-Market Teams
vs
MixmaxTurn Your Outreach Into Relationships
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3

Apollo vs Mixmax

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Apollo is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 51 versus 8.5 for Mixmax, and ranks ahead in 94% of the answers that name both.

Choose Apollo if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (51 vs 8.5)
  • You need more native integrations (200+ vs 40+)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (60% vs 33% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 or CCPA or ISO/IEC 27001 or CASA Tier 2 or EU-US DPF or PCI DSS coverage

Choose Mixmax if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or HIPAA (BAA available) or Google verified for OAuth and API security coverage
  • Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
  • Strong fit for Gmail and Google Workspace teams
  • Lightweight email sequences and engagement tracking

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Apollo Mixmax
Visibility score51%8.5%
Change vs last weekdown−2.8%up+0.1%
Rank in Sales Engagement#4#11
Share of voice9.4%2.5%
Mentions this run5917
Positive in AI answers60%33%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Apollo 51%

Apollo −2.799999999999997pp · Mixmax +0.09999999999999964pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Apollo leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
70.6%
10.2%
AI Mode
39.1%
3.7%
Perplexity
43.3%
11.5%
ApolloMixmax

Head to head in AI answers

16 engine answers name both brands

15Apollo ranked higher
1Mixmax ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionApolloMixmax
Pricing modelPer seatUsage-based
Entry priceContact salesFree; paid from $29 / mo
Free planYesYes
DeploymentCloud platformChrome extension inside Gmail, with Outlook support and a web app
Integrations200+40+
ComplianceGDPR, SOC 2, CCPA, ISO/IEC 27001, CASA Tier 2, CPRA, EU-US DPF, PCI DSSSOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, GDPR, CPRA, HIPAA (BAA available), Google verified for OAuth and API security
SupportEmail support at support@apollo.io, Dedicated support on Custom plans, Sales team for Custom plan discussionsLive chat with the Mixmax team, Sales contact for larger teams
Founded20152014
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CASan Francisco, CA
Employees501–1,00051–200
FundingSeries D · $250M raisedSeries A
Best forSales and go-to-market teams that run prospecting, outreach and dialing and want data, AI and execution in one systemIndividual sellers, founders, consultants and teams that do outbound outreach and want to work from Gmail, from solo users to larger sales teams

Plans side by side

Apollo

Free$0
BasicCustom
ProfessionalCustom
CustomCustom
Apollo pricing

Mixmax

I follow up now and then (50 recipients a month)$0user/month
I reach out every week (100 recipients a month)$29user/month, billed yearly
Outreach is my job (1,500 recipients a month)$89user/month, billed yearly
We run outreach at scale (3,000 recipients a month)$129user/month, billed yearly
Mixmax pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Apollo

  • Large B2B contact database combined with prospecting and email sequencing
  • Transparent self-serve per-user pricing with a free tier
  • Strong all-in-one value for prospecting and outreach
  • Affordable, reliable choice for small teams and startups
  • Widely used and highly rated by reviewers

    Mixmax

    • Strong fit for Gmail and Google Workspace teams
    • Lightweight email sequences and engagement tracking
    • Offers a free tier
    • Attractive for Salesforce-oriented sales teams
    • Named among top recommendations for sales engagement
    • Free tier limited to about 50 sequence recipients per month

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Apollo vs Mixmax”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/apollo-vs-mixmax, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.