HubSpotThe agentic customer platform to scale your business.
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
HubSpot vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
HubSpot is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 39.1 versus 1.5 for Qwilr, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose HubSpot if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (39.1 vs 1.5)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 3 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
Choose Qwilr if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 35% positive)
- You need PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | HubSpot | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 39.1% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #3 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 9.8% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 54 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 35% | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
HubSpot 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
HubSpot leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
HubSpotQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
2HubSpot ranked higher
0Qwilr ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | HubSpot | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which sales enablement platform offers a free trial? | ChatGPT | #1 | #4 |
| Which sales enablement platform offers a free trial? | Perplexity | #2 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | HubSpot | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $7 per seat / mo | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 14-day trial |
| Onboarding fee | $3,000 | — |
| Deployment | Cloud | Web-based, web-native software |
| Integrations | 2000+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3 | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | Phone | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2006 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 5,000+ | 51–200 |
| Funding | Corporate round | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Startups, small and mid-sized businesses and enterprises wanting marketing, sales and service on one CRM. | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
HubSpot
Free$0month
Starter$7month per seat (promotional, new customers; $20/mo/seat standard)
Professional$800month, includes 3 Core Seats (annual commitment; $890/mo)
Enterprise$3,600month, includes 5 Core Seats
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
HubSpot
- intuitive, user-friendly interface
- generous free tier
- all-in-one CRM and marketing platform
- tight CRM integration for live chat and service
- good fit for startups and small businesses
- higher-tier costs and onboarding fees
- higher month-to-month pricing than annual plans
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “HubSpot vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/hubspot-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.