IcertisAI-native contract intelligence
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2
Icertis vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 3.3 for Icertis, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Icertis if…
- You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or FedRAMP or NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 or TISAX or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or GDPR or ITAR or Microsoft SSPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
Choose Qwilr if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 3.3)
- AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 40% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Icertis | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.3% | 28.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Proposals & Contracts | #23 | #4 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 7.2% |
| Mentions this run | 5 | 37 |
| Positive in AI answers | 40% | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Icertis 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
IcertisQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
0Icertis ranked higher
2Qwilr ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Icertis | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|---|
| Compare the leading Proposals & Contracts platforms | ChatGPT | #9 | #3 |
| Official website of the top proposal and contract tool vendors | ChatGPT | #9 | #3 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Icertis | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | — | Per seat |
| Entry price | — | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | — | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Public or private cloud | Web-based, web-native software |
| Compliance | SOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, FedRAMP, NIST 800-171 Rev. 2, TISAX, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, GDPR, ITAR, Microsoft SSPA | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | — | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2009 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Bellevue, WA, United States | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Round from existing backer B Capital, reportedly to pay down debt | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Large global enterprises that manage high volumes of complex contracts | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Icertis
Pricing not available.
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Icertis
- Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
- Handles complex commercial management
- Named as a prominent contract lifecycle management option
- Suited to large multinational enterprises
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Icertis vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/icertis-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.