Skip to content
SlateIndex
IcertisAI-native contract intelligence
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

Icertis vs Qwilr

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Qwilr is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 28.3 versus 3.3 for Icertis, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Icertis if…

  • You need SOC 1 Type 2 or SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or FedRAMP or NIST 800-171 Rev. 2 or TISAX or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or GDPR or ITAR or Microsoft SSPA coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
  • Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
  • Handles complex commercial management

Choose Qwilr if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (28.3 vs 3.3)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 40% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
  • Interactive, web-based proposals

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Icertis Qwilr
Visibility score3.3%28.3%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#23#4
Share of voice0.9%7.2%
Mentions this run537
Positive in AI answers40%51%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Icertis 3%

Icertis 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Qwilr leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
6.7%
30.2%
AI Mode
3.1%
26.9%
Perplexity
0%
27.8%
IcertisQwilr

Head to head in AI answers

2 engine answers name both brands

0Icertis ranked higher
2Qwilr ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionIcertisQwilr
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—$35 per seat / mo
Free plan—No · 14-day trial
DeploymentPublic or private cloudWeb-based, web-native software
ComplianceSOC 1 Type 2, SOC 2 Type 2, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, FedRAMP, NIST 800-171 Rev. 2, TISAX, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, GDPR, ITAR, Microsoft SSPASOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS
Support—Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions
Founded20092014
HeadquartersBellevue, WA, United StatesRedfern, New South Wales, Australia
Employees1,001–5,00051–200
FundingRound from existing backer B Capital, reportedly to pay down debtSeries A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised
Best forLarge global enterprises that manage high volumes of complex contractsSales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement.

Plans side by side

Icertis

Pricing not available.

Qwilr

Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Qwilr pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Icertis

  • Recognized by analysts as a powerhouse for enterprise-wide contract intelligence
  • Handles complex commercial management
  • Named as a prominent contract lifecycle management option
  • Suited to large multinational enterprises

    Qwilr

    • Interactive, web-based proposals
    • Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
    • Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
    • Lower cost with annual billing
    • 14-day free trial available

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Icertis vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/icertis-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.