Skip to content
SlateIndex
IroncladThe AI CLM that unlocks intelligence from every contract.
vs
ResponsiveResponsive AI powers bids, questionnaires, and trust centers with insight, accuracy, and speed.
Comparison · Proposals & Contracts · weekly run Nov 2

Ironclad vs Responsive

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Ironclad is the stronger AI pick in Proposals & Contracts: it has a visibility score of 15 versus 10.7 for Responsive, and ranks ahead in 50% of the answers that name both.

Choose Ironclad if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (15 vs 10.7)
  • You need more native integrations (8000+ vs 32+)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (45% vs 33% positive)
  • You need SOC 1 Type II or SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27017 or ISO 27018 or HIPAA or CSA Trusted Provider coverage

Choose Responsive if…

  • You need AICPA SOC 2 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CCPA or STAR Level 1 coverage
  • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
  • Designed for complex enterprise responses
  • Top pick for RFP response management

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Ironclad Responsive
Visibility score15%10.7%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Proposals & Contracts#9#10
Share of voice4.3%4%
Mentions this run2320
Positive in AI answers45%33%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Ironclad 15%

Ironclad 0pp · Responsive 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Ironclad leads on 1 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
24.4%
3%
AI Mode
9.6%
15.7%
Perplexity
10.9%
13.3%
IroncladResponsive

Head to head in AI answers

6 engine answers name both brands

3Ironclad ranked higher
3Responsive ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionIroncladResponsive
Pricing model—Flat tiers
Entry price—$10,000 / mo
Free plan—No
DeploymentCloud-basedFlexible hosting options
Integrations8000+32+
ComplianceSOC 1 Type II, SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27017, ISO 27018, GDPR, HIPAA, CSA Trusted ProviderGDPR, AICPA SOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, CCPA, STAR Level 1
SupportHelp Center, Academy, Community, Dedicated customer success teamProfessional Services with APMP-certified experts for onboarding and training, Premium deployment and support on Growth and Enterprise editions
Founded20142015
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CaliforniaFrisco, Texas, United States
Employees501–1,000501–1,000
FundingSeries E · $333M raisedRound led by Elevate Capital
Best forEnterprises whose legal, procurement, sales and IT teams all need to manage contracts in one system.Dedicated proposal or operations teams with legal, InfoSec and compliance involvement, and global or multi-region operations.

Plans side by side

Ironclad

Pricing not available.

Responsive

Emerging Edition$10,000year (starting from, platform fee)
Growth EditionCustomyear
Enterprise EditionCustomyear
Responsive pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Ironclad

  • Streamlined, digital-first contract lifecycle management
  • Named a market leader for digital contracting workflows
  • Robust repository search and tracking
  • Approval, negotiation, and routing automation
  • Suited to enterprise legal contract governance

    Responsive

    • Strong enterprise choice for high-volume RFPs
    • Designed for complex enterprise responses
    • Top pick for RFP response management
    • Good for security questionnaires and large-scale content reuse
    • Recommended in G2's 2026 RFP software list

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Ironclad vs Responsive”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/ironclad-vs-responsive, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.