JumpCloud vs Omada
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
JumpCloud is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 25.8 versus 0.6 for Omada, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose JumpCloud if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (25.8 vs 0.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (58% vs 0% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
Choose Omada if…
- You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
- You need ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or SOC 3 coverage
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | JumpCloud | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 25.8% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.7% | up+0.6% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #3 | #34 |
| Share of voice | 6.7% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 21 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 58% | 0% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
JumpCloud −2.5pp · Omada 0pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
JumpCloud leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | JumpCloud | Omada |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a identity and access management platform for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #4 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | JumpCloud | Omada |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $9 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 30-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | SaaS on Microsoft Azure (EU or US region), private tenant, or on-premises |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 | ISO/IEC 27001:2022, SOC 2 Type 2, SOC 3 |
| Support | Standard support, Premium 24×7 support, Help Center, JumpCloud University | Customer Success Team, Service Desk, ITSM system access, Professional services |
| Founded | 2012 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Louisville, Colorado, United States | Copenhagen, Denmark |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 201–500 |
| Funding | Series F · $400M raised | Majority investment (GRO and Kirk Kapital) |
| Best for | IT teams, from startups to enterprises and MSPs, that manage mixed-OS device fleets and want identity and device management in one platform. | Regulated enterprises and government organizations that need identity governance and administration |
Plans side by side
JumpCloud
Omada
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
JumpCloud
- unified identity, access, and device management
- transparent, published per-user pricing and annual savings
- cross-platform support for Windows, Mac, and Linux
- free tier and free trial for small teams
- well suited to small and mid-sized businesses
Omada
- Recommended as a dedicated IGA product for heavy audit, complex role, ERP, or on-premises needs
- Named among IGA leaders in KuppingerCole 2024 Leadership Compass
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “JumpCloud vs Omada”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/jumpcloud-vs-omada, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.