KeapSmall business CRM and automation platform
vs
MoosendGo from unread to subscribed. And from manual to automated.
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Keap vs Moosend
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Moosend is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 1.9 versus 0.9 for Keap.
Choose Keap if…
- You need more native integrations (5000+ vs 80+)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- Straightforward tier-based pricing with no features gated behind higher packages
- Lower effective monthly cost when paying annually
Choose Moosend if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.9 vs 0.9)
- AI answers describe it more positively (57% vs 25% positive)
- You need ISO 27001 or M3AAWG or Certified Senders Alliance coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Keap | Moosend |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.9% | 1.9% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #32 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 0.2% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 25% | 57% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Keap 0pp · Moosend 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Moosend leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
KeapMoosend
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Keap ranked higher
0Moosend ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Keap | Moosend |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $299 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud | Cloud, hosted on Amazon Web Services in the EU |
| Integrations | 5000+ | 80+ |
| Compliance | — | ISO 27001, M3AAWG, Certified Senders Alliance |
| Support | 24/7 chat support, U.S.-based phone support, Dedicated Customer Success Manager, Help center | Knowledge base, 24/5 email support, 24/5 live chat support |
| Founded | 2001 | — |
| Headquarters | Chandler, Arizona, United States | Waltham, Massachusetts, U.S. (parent Constant Contact) |
| Employees | 201–500 | — |
| Funding | Debt | — |
| Best for | Growth-focused small businesses such as consultants, marketing agencies, coaches and startups that want marketing and sales automation | Agencies, publishers, ecommerce, SaaS and non-profit organisations that want email marketing and automation |
Plans side by side
Moosend
ProCustommonth, priced by contact count
Moosend+Customcustom quote
EnterpriseCustomcustom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Keap
- Straightforward tier-based pricing with no features gated behind higher packages
- Lower effective monthly cost when paying annually
- Suited to growing teams needing workflow automation, custom sales pipelines and advanced reporting
Moosend
- Attractive annual pricing
- 30-day free trial
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Keap vs Moosend”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/keap-vs-moosend, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.