JumpCloud vs Keycloak
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
JumpCloud is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 25.8 versus 5.6 for Keycloak, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose JumpCloud if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (25.8 vs 5.6)
- AI answers describe it more positively (58% vs 33% positive)
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or ISO 27001 coverage
- unified identity, access, and device management
Choose Keycloak if…
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
- Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | JumpCloud | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 25.8% | 5.6% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.7% | down−0.3% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #3 | #15 |
| Share of voice | 6.7% | 2.1% |
| Mentions this run | 21 | 7 |
| Positive in AI answers | 58% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
JumpCloud −2.5pp · Keycloak −0.7000000000000002pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
JumpCloud leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
4 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | JumpCloud | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|---|
| What are the best Identity & Access Management tools in 2026? | Perplexity | #3 | #8 |
| Best identity and access management platform for startups | Perplexity | #1 | #6 |
| Alternatives to the most popular identity and access management platform | Perplexity | #4 | #8 |
| Is there a free identity and access management platform for small teams? | Perplexity | #1 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | JumpCloud | Keycloak |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | — |
| Entry price | $9 per seat / mo | — |
| Free plan | No · 30-day trial | — |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Self-hosted; ships as a single lightweight container image, with clustering for scalability and availability |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001 | — |
| Support | Standard support, Premium 24×7 support, Help Center, JumpCloud University | Community support via GitHub Discussions, Commercial support via Red Hat build of Keycloak |
| Founded | 2012 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Louisville, Colorado, United States | — |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | — |
| Funding | Series F · $400M raised | — |
| Best for | IT teams, from startups to enterprises and MSPs, that manage mixed-OS device fleets and want identity and device management in one platform. | Teams that want to self-host standards-based single sign-on and identity brokering for their applications |
Plans side by side
JumpCloud
Keycloak
Pricing not available.
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
JumpCloud
- unified identity, access, and device management
- transparent, published per-user pricing and annual savings
- cross-platform support for Windows, Mac, and Linux
- free tier and free trial for small teams
- well suited to small and mid-sized businesses
Keycloak
- Free and open-source software
- Strong flexibility and customization for technical teams
- Top pick as a self-hosted option
- Backed by Red Hat and community; popular open-source IAM tool
- Supports SAML, OAuth 2.0, and OpenID Connect
- Team must handle hosting, upgrades, backups, and security
- Less operational simplicity than managed alternatives
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “JumpCloud vs Keycloak”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/jumpcloud-vs-keycloak, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.