Skip to content
SlateIndex
MindtickleYour AI teammate for every deal
vs
OutreachAgentic AI Platform for Revenue Teams
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2

Mindtickle vs Outreach

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Mindtickle is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 32.4 versus 8 for Outreach, and ranks ahead in 89% of the answers that name both.

Choose Mindtickle if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (32.4 vs 8)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (51% vs 28% positive)
  • You need ISO 27001:2022 or ISO 27701:2019 or ISO 27017:2015 or ISO 27018:2019 or ISO 22301:2019 or ISO 42001:2023 or SOC 2 or GDPR or 21 CFR Part 11 or CSA STAR Level 1 coverage
  • Strong sales readiness, onboarding, and certification focus

Choose Outreach if…

  • You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 or ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or CSA STAR coverage
  • Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform
  • Deep workflow controls and granular sequence analytics
  • Recognized as an enterprise leader by analysts

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Mindtickle Outreach
Visibility score32.4%8%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Sales Enablement#5#12
Share of voice8%2.3%
Mentions this run4513
Positive in AI answers51%28%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Mindtickle 32%

Mindtickle 0pp · Outreach 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Mindtickle leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
31.1%
5%
AI Mode
30.9%
6.3%
Perplexity
35.2%
12.8%
MindtickleOutreach

Head to head in AI answers

9 engine answers name both brands

8Mindtickle ranked higher
1Outreach ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionMindtickleOutreach
Pricing model—Per seat
Entry price—Contact sales
Free plan—No
Integrations100+—
ComplianceISO 27001:2022, ISO 27701:2019, ISO 27017:2015, ISO 27018:2019, ISO 22301:2019, ISO 42001:2023, SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, 21 CFR Part 11, CSA STAR Level 1SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, HIPAA, CSA STAR
SupportProfessional services, Success specialistsPlus support included with Amplify Core, Managed services included with Amplify Pro, Technical account management and enterprise support, Professional services packages for onboarding
Founded20122014
HeadquartersSan Francisco, CaliforniaSeattle, Washington
Employees501–1,000501–1,000
FundingUndisclosed round · $281M raisedSeries G · $489M raised
Best forMid-market and enterprise sales teamsRevenue teams, from SDRs and account executives to sales managers, RevOps and customer success, that want prospecting, deal management, coaching and forecasting in one platform.

Plans side by side

Mindtickle

Pricing not available.

Outreach

Amplify EssentialsCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify CoreCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify PlusCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify ProCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Outreach pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Mindtickle

  • Strong sales readiness, onboarding, and certification focus
  • Effective coaching and skills development
  • AI role-play and video coaching
  • High user ratings on G2
  • Free starting tier
  • Opaque, custom pricing behind contact-sales forms
  • Needs a sizable team, content volume, and budget to implement

Outreach

  • Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform
  • Deep workflow controls and granular sequence analytics
  • Recognized as an enterprise leader by analysts
  • Strong multi-channel sequencing, AI-guided selling and forecasting
  • Quote-based pricing with no public prices
  • Heavy and complex, slow to configure
  • Annual contracts with minimum seat counts

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Mindtickle vs Outreach”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/mindtickle-vs-outreach, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.