Skip to content
SlateIndex
OutreachAgentic AI Platform for Revenue Teams
vs
SeismicThe AI platform for revenue execution
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2

Outreach vs Seismic

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Seismic is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 55.2 versus 8 for Outreach, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Outreach if…

  • You need HIPAA or CSA STAR coverage
  • Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform
  • Deep workflow controls and granular sequence analytics
  • Recognized as an enterprise leader by analysts

Choose Seismic if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.2 vs 8)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (39% vs 28% positive)
  • You need EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 2

Metric Outreach Seismic
Visibility score8%55.2%
Change vs last weekNewNew
Rank in Sales Enablement#12#2
Share of voice2.3%9.9%
Mentions this run1355
Positive in AI answers28%39%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Outreach 8%

Outreach 0pp · Seismic 0pp over 0 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Seismic leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
5%
64.1%
AI Mode
6.3%
63%
Perplexity
12.8%
38.7%
OutreachSeismic

Head to head in AI answers

9 engine answers name both brands

0Outreach ranked higher
9Seismic ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionOutreachSeismic
Pricing modelPer seat—
Entry priceContact sales—
Free planNo—
Integrations—150+
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, HIPAA, CSA STARSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, EU-U.S. Data Privacy Framework
SupportPlus support included with Amplify Core, Managed services included with Amplify Pro, Technical account management and enterprise support, Professional services packages for onboarding—
Founded20142010
HeadquartersSeattle, WashingtonSan Diego, California, US
Employees501–1,0001,001–5,000
FundingSeries G · $489M raisedSeries E, led by Lightspeed Venture Partners · $440M raised
Best forRevenue teams, from SDRs and account executives to sales managers, RevOps and customer success, that want prospecting, deal management, coaching and forecasting in one platform.Global enterprise sales, marketing and customer-facing teams in financial services, manufacturing, technology and life sciences

Plans side by side

Outreach

Amplify EssentialsCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify CoreCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify PlusCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify ProCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Outreach pricing

Seismic

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Outreach

  • Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform
  • Deep workflow controls and granular sequence analytics
  • Recognized as an enterprise leader by analysts
  • Strong multi-channel sequencing, AI-guided selling and forecasting
  • Quote-based pricing with no public prices
  • Heavy and complex, slow to configure
  • Annual contracts with minimum seat counts

Seismic

  • Enterprise content management and document governance at scale
  • Deep analytics and AI-powered revenue execution
  • Strong for large enterprises needing content personalization and automation
  • Highly rated on G2 and Gartner review data
  • Broad enablement platform combining content, training, coaching, and buyer engagement
  • Expensive, custom pricing with no transparent or free option
  • Heavy and overkill for smaller or early-stage teams
  • Long deployment timelines of three to six months

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Outreach vs Seismic”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/outreach-vs-seismic, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.