ScribeWorkflow context for teams and AI agents
vs
TanaYour meetings. Minus the homework.
Comparison · Knowledge Management · weekly run Nov 3
Scribe vs Tana
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Scribe is the stronger AI pick in Knowledge Management: it has a visibility score of 1.4 versus 1.3 for Tana.
Choose Scribe if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1.4 vs 1.3)
- You want a lower entry price ($13 vs $19)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA or CCPA or GDPR or FERPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)
Choose Tana if…
- You need SOC 2 Type 2 or GDPR compliant coverage
- powerful node-based outliner
- turns messy notes into structured networked hubs
- advanced AI-powered knowledge management
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Scribe | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1.4% | 1.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Knowledge Management | #40 | #42 |
| Share of voice | 0.4% | 0.6% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 3 |
| Positive in AI answers | — | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Scribe 0pp · Tana 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Scribe leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ScribeTana
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Scribe ranked higher
0Tana ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Scribe | Tana |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $13 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | Yes |
| Deployment | — | Desktop app for Mac, Windows and Linux, plus web |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, HIPAA, CCPA, GDPR, FERPA | SOC 2 Type 2, GDPR compliant |
| Support | Customer support, Customer success, Help Center | FAQ on tana.inc, Designated customer success manager on the Business plan |
| Founded | 2019 | — |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA, United States | Palo Alto, CA, United States |
| Employees | 201–500 | 11–50 |
| Funding | Series C, led by StepStone, at a $1.3B valuation · $130M raised | Series A · $25M raised |
| Best for | Teams that document processes for training, onboarding, SOPs, software rollouts and AI agents, from solo consultants to large enterprises | AI-native teams whose agents need meeting context |
Plans side by side
Scribe
Basic$0free
Pro Personal$25per seat per month
Pro Team$13per seat per month
EnterpriseCustomcustom
Tana
Free$0free forever
Pro$19per member per month, billed monthly
Business$35per member per month, billed yearly (from price)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Scribe
- useful for documenting processes
- creating step-by-step guides
- free sign-up
Tana
- powerful node-based outliner
- turns messy notes into structured networked hubs
- advanced AI-powered knowledge management
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Scribe vs Tana”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/scribe-vs-tana, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.