Act-OnMarketing automation for your entire customer lifecycle
vs
LeadSquaredAI-powered CRM for sales, service, marketing and field teams
Comparison · Marketing Automation · weekly run Nov 2
Act-On vs LeadSquared
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Act-On is the stronger AI pick in Marketing Automation: it has a visibility score of 1 versus 0.6 for LeadSquared, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Act-On if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (1 vs 0.6)
- You want a lower entry price ($900 vs $2,000)
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
Choose LeadSquared if…
- AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 33% positive)
- You need ISO 27001:2022 or HIPAA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Act-On | LeadSquared |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 1% | 0.6% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Marketing Automation | #31 | #36 |
| Share of voice | 0.5% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 3 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 50% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Act-On 0pp · LeadSquared 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Act-On leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
Act-OnLeadSquared
Head to head in AI answers
2 engine answers name both brands
2Act-On ranked higher
0LeadSquared ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Act-On | LeadSquared |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which marketing automation vendors do analysts recommend? | ChatGPT | #12 | #13 |
| Which marketing automation vendors do analysts recommend? | AI Mode | #7 | #10 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Act-On | LeadSquared |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Flat tiers |
| Entry price | $900 / mo | $2,000 / mo |
| Free plan | No | No |
| Deployment | — | Cloud, hosted on Amazon Web Services |
| Integrations | — | 162+ |
| Compliance | — | ISO 27001:2022, HIPAA |
| Support | Standard support package with email-based support, Premium support package, recommended for Enterprise | Phone support, Email support, Help documentation and training, Onboarding |
| Founded | 2008 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Portland, Oregon, United States | Bengaluru, India |
| Employees | 201–500 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Round of $4M, about six months before the 2011 Series C · $82M raised | Series C · $188M raised |
| Best for | Midsize and enterprise marketing teams focused on growing revenue through lifecycle marketing, including distributed organizations such as franchises and branch offices. | Businesses with high lead volumes, high velocity and multiple sales channels and teams |
Plans side by side
LeadSquared
Marketing Pro$2,000per account, billed annually
Marketing Super$3,500per account, billed annually
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Act-On
- Favored for mid-market demand generation
- Lower total cost of ownership
- Fast deployment
LeadSquared
- low-code process automation
- agile workflow orchestration
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Act-On vs LeadSquared”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/act-on-vs-leadsquared, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.