ActiveCampaign vs Close
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Close is the stronger AI pick in CRM: it has a visibility score of 7.3 versus 2.1 for ActiveCampaign, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose ActiveCampaign if…
- You need more native integrations (1000+ vs 100+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (53% vs 52% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or HIPAA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
Choose Close if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (7.3 vs 2.1)
- You need SOC 2 Type II or CCPA coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | ActiveCampaign | Close |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.1% | 7.3% |
| Change vs last week | New | down−1% |
| Rank in CRM | #23 | #10 |
| Share of voice | 0.9% | 2.3% |
| Mentions this run | 4 | 11 |
| Positive in AI answers | 53% | 52% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ActiveCampaign +2.1pp · Close −0.8999999999999995pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Close leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | ActiveCampaign | Close |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which CRM tools offer annual discounts? | Perplexity | #11 | #7 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ActiveCampaign | Close |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 14-day trial |
| Onboarding fee | Included | — |
| Deployment | — | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | 1000+ | 100+ |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2, HIPAA | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Help center, FAQs, Support request form, Dedicated account team on Enterprise plan | Knowledge base, Email support |
| Founded | 2003 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, Illinois, United States | Austin, Texas, United States |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series C · $360M raised | Angel |
| Best for | Small teams and growing businesses that want AI to run everyday email, SMS and WhatsApp marketing | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS |
Plans side by side
ActiveCampaign
Close
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ActiveCampaign
- advanced marketing automation
- deep CRM integration
- behavioral and lifecycle automation
- strong email marketing platform
- affordable pricing with annual discount
- charges for total stored prospect records
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ActiveCampaign vs Close”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/activecampaign-vs-close, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.