ActiveCampaignAutonomous marketing platform for email, SMS and WhatsApp
vs
MixmaxTurn Your Outreach Into Relationships
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
ActiveCampaign vs Mixmax
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Mixmax is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 8.5 versus 0.3 for ActiveCampaign.
Choose ActiveCampaign if…
- You need more native integrations (1000+ vs 40+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (53% vs 33% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or HIPAA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (501–1,000 employees)
Choose Mixmax if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (8.5 vs 0.3)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II or SOC 3 or CPRA or HIPAA (BAA available) or Google verified for OAuth and API security coverage
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | ActiveCampaign | Mixmax |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 0.3% | 8.5% |
| Change vs last week | no change0% | up+0.1% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #43 | #11 |
| Share of voice | 0.1% | 2.5% |
| Mentions this run | 1 | 17 |
| Positive in AI answers | 53% | 33% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
ActiveCampaign 0pp · Mixmax +0.09999999999999964pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Mixmax leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ActiveCampaignMixmax
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0ActiveCampaign ranked higher
0Mixmax ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | ActiveCampaign | Mixmax |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Usage-based |
| Entry price | Contact sales | Free; paid from $29 / mo |
| Free plan | No | Yes |
| Onboarding fee | Included | — |
| Deployment | — | Chrome extension inside Gmail, with Outlook support and a web app |
| Integrations | 1000+ | 40+ |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2, HIPAA | SOC 2 Type II, SOC 3, GDPR, CPRA, HIPAA (BAA available), Google verified for OAuth and API security |
| Support | Help center, FAQs, Support request form, Dedicated account team on Enterprise plan | Live chat with the Mixmax team, Sales contact for larger teams |
| Founded | 2003 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | Chicago, Illinois, United States | San Francisco, CA |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series C · $360M raised | Series A |
| Best for | Small teams and growing businesses that want AI to run everyday email, SMS and WhatsApp marketing | Individual sellers, founders, consultants and teams that do outbound outreach and want to work from Gmail, from solo users to larger sales teams |
Plans side by side
ActiveCampaign
StarterCustommonth, billed yearly for 1,000 contacts
PlusCustommonth, billed yearly for 1,000 contacts
ProCustommonth, billed yearly for 1,000 contacts
EnterpriseCustommonth, billed yearly for 1,000 contacts
Mixmax
I follow up now and then (50 recipients a month)$0user/month
I reach out every week (100 recipients a month)$29user/month, billed yearly
Outreach is my job (1,500 recipients a month)$89user/month, billed yearly
We run outreach at scale (3,000 recipients a month)$129user/month, billed yearly
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
ActiveCampaign
- advanced marketing automation
- deep CRM integration
- behavioral and lifecycle automation
- strong email marketing platform
- affordable pricing with annual discount
- charges for total stored prospect records
Mixmax
- Strong fit for Gmail and Google Workspace teams
- Lightweight email sequences and engagement tracking
- Offers a free tier
- Attractive for Salesforce-oriented sales teams
- Named among top recommendations for sales engagement
- Free tier limited to about 50 sequence recipients per month
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “ActiveCampaign vs Mixmax”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/activecampaign-vs-mixmax, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.