Amplemarket vs Close
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Amplemarket is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 3.3 versus 2.8 for Close, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Amplemarket if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (3.3 vs 2.8)
- You need EU-US Data Privacy Framework coverage
- Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
- AI-driven outbound and prospecting
Choose Close if…
- You want a lower entry price ($19 vs $600)
- You need more native integrations (100+ vs 28+)
- AI answers describe it more positively (52% vs 27% positive)
- You need GDPR or CCPA coverage
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Amplemarket | Close |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 3.3% | 2.8% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.2% | down−0.6% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #22 | #26 |
| Share of voice | 1.5% | 1% |
| Mentions this run | 10 | 6 |
| Positive in AI answers | 27% | 52% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Amplemarket −0.30000000000000027pp · Close −0.5pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Amplemarket leads on 2 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Amplemarket | Close |
|---|---|---|---|
| Which Sales Engagement tools offer annual discounts? | AI Mode | #7 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Amplemarket | Close |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Flat tiers | Per seat |
| Entry price | $600 / mo | $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | No | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud-hosted on Google Cloud | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | 28+ | 100+ |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, EU-US Data Privacy Framework | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA |
| Support | Scaled CSM support (Startup plan), Dedicated CSM (Growth and Elite plans), Personalized onboarding, Community weekly expert sessions | Knowledge base, Email support |
| Founded | 2019 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, California | Austin, Texas, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series A, reported by a third-party site and not confirmed · $12M raised | Angel |
| Best for | Sales teams that want prospecting data, buying signals and multichannel outreach in one platform, with AI agents doing research | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS |
Plans side by side
Amplemarket
Close
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Amplemarket
- AI-driven outbound and prospecting
- Combines data, intent, personalization and sequences
- Strong option for mid-market outbound
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Amplemarket vs Close”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/amplemarket-vs-close, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.