ApolloThe AI GTM System for Go-to-Market Teams
vs
AvomaAI Platform for Note-taking, Scheduling & Coaching
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Apollo vs Avoma
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Apollo is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 4 versus 0.4 for Avoma, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Apollo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4 vs 0.4)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (60% vs 25% positive)
- You need SOC 2 or CCPA or ISO/IEC 27001 or CASA Tier 2 or CPRA or EU-US DPF or PCI DSS coverage
Choose Avoma if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or HIPAA (Enterprise plan) coverage
- free view-only and collaborator seats
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Apollo | Avoma |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4% | 0.4% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #19 | #39 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 0.2% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 1 |
| Positive in AI answers | 60% | 25% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Apollo 0pp · Avoma 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Apollo leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ApolloAvoma
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
0Apollo ranked higher
1Avoma ranked higher
| Prompt | Engine | Apollo | Avoma |
|---|---|---|---|
| What should a sales enablement platform integrate with? | ChatGPT | #9 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Apollo | Avoma |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $19 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud platform | Cloud-hosted on AWS in the USA |
| Integrations | 200+ | — |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2, CCPA, ISO/IEC 27001, CASA Tier 2, CPRA, EU-US DPF, PCI DSS | SOC 2 Type II, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, GDPR, HIPAA (Enterprise plan) |
| Support | Email support at support@apollo.io, Dedicated support on Custom plans, Sales team for Custom plan discussions | Self-service knowledge base, Live chat and email support, Customer Success Manager, Shared Slack channel |
| Founded | 2015 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Palo Alto, California, US |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series D · $250M raised | Series A · $15M raised |
| Best for | Sales and go-to-market teams that run prospecting, outreach and dialing and want data, AI and execution in one system | Customer-facing sales, success and marketing teams at startups and scaleups |
Plans side by side
Avoma
Startup$19recorder seat/month, billed annually ($29 billed monthly)
Organization$29recorder seat/month, billed annually ($39 billed monthly)
Enterprise$39recorder seat/month, billed annually only
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Apollo
- Large B2B contact database combined with prospecting and email sequencing
- Transparent self-serve per-user pricing with a free tier
- Strong all-in-one value for prospecting and outreach
- Affordable, reliable choice for small teams and startups
- Widely used and highly rated by reviewers
Avoma
- free view-only and collaborator seats
- per-seat pricing for recorder seats
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Apollo vs Avoma”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/apollo-vs-avoma, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.