ApolloThe AI GTM System for Go-to-Market Teams
vs
QwilrHelp your worst rep send your best proposals.
Comparison · Sales Enablement · weekly run Nov 2
Apollo vs Qwilr
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Apollo is the stronger AI pick in Sales Enablement: it has a visibility score of 4 versus 1.5 for Qwilr.
Choose Apollo if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (4 vs 1.5)
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (60% vs 51% positive)
- You need GDPR or SOC 2 or CCPA or ISO/IEC 27001 or CASA Tier 2 or CPRA or EU-US DPF or PCI DSS coverage
Choose Qwilr if…
- You need SOC 2 Type II or PCI-DSS coverage
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 2
| Metric | Apollo | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 4% | 1.5% |
| Change vs last week | New | New |
| Rank in Sales Enablement | #19 | #28 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 0.3% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 60% | 51% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Apollo 0pp · Qwilr 0pp over 0 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Apollo leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ApolloQwilr
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Apollo ranked higher
0Qwilr ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Apollo | Qwilr |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Contact sales | $35 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 14-day trial |
| Deployment | Cloud platform | Web-based, web-native software |
| Integrations | 200+ | — |
| Compliance | GDPR, SOC 2, CCPA, ISO/IEC 27001, CASA Tier 2, CPRA, EU-US DPF, PCI DSS | SOC 2 Type II, PCI-DSS |
| Support | Email support at support@apollo.io, Dedicated support on Custom plans, Sales team for Custom plan discussions | Email support, Help center, Chat support, Training sessions |
| Founded | 2015 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, CA | Redfern, New South Wales, Australia |
| Employees | 501–1,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series D · $250M raised | Series A (AirTree Ventures) · $9M raised |
| Best for | Sales and go-to-market teams that run prospecting, outreach and dialing and want data, AI and execution in one system | Sales teams that send proposals, quotes and contracts and want to track buyer engagement. |
Plans side by side
Qwilr
Starter$35user/month, billed annually ($49 monthly)
Growth$55user/month, annual only, min 5 users
Scale$75user/month, annual only, min 10 users
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Apollo
- Large B2B contact database combined with prospecting and email sequencing
- Transparent self-serve per-user pricing with a free tier
- Strong all-in-one value for prospecting and outreach
- Affordable, reliable choice for small teams and startups
- Widely used and highly rated by reviewers
Qwilr
- Interactive, web-based proposals
- Polished, visually striking proposal presentation
- Frequently shortlisted and highly rated among proposal tools
- Lower cost with annual billing
- 14-day free trial available
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 100%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Apollo vs Qwilr”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/apollo-vs-qwilr, data of Nov 2, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.