Skip to content
SlateIndex
Auth0Authentication and authorization platform for users, AI agents and APIs
vs
CyberArkUnified IAM, PAM, and IGA identity security platform.
Comparison · Identity & Access Management · weekly run Nov 3

Auth0 vs CyberArk

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Auth0 is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 17.2 versus 15.6 for CyberArk, and ranks ahead in 45% of the answers that name both.

Choose Auth0 if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (17.2 vs 15.6)
  • You need ISO 27001 or ISO 27018 coverage
  • Developer-friendly customer identity and authentication
  • Strong, customizable CIAM for customer-facing applications

Choose CyberArk if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (49% vs 47% positive)
  • You need SOC 3 or ISO/IEC 27001:2022 or ISO/IEC 27017:2015 or ISO/IEC 27018:2019 or ISO 9001:2015 or ISO/IEC 42001:2023 or ISO 22301 or CSA STAR or Cyber Essentials or Cyber Essentials Plus or FedRAMP High or Common Criteria or PCI DSS v4.0.1 or HIPAA or IRAP or GDPR or CCPA coverage
  • Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
  • Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Auth0 CyberArk
Visibility score17.2%15.6%
Change vs last weekup+2.6%up+2.1%
Rank in Identity & Access Management#5#7
Share of voice5.4%6.1%
Mentions this run1719
Positive in AI answers47%49%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Auth0 17%

Auth0 +3.3999999999999986pp · CyberArk +0.5pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Auth0 leads on 2 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
11.4%
17.5%
AI Mode
18.9%
16.5%
Perplexity
15.6%
14.6%
Auth0CyberArk

Head to head in AI answers

11 engine answers name both brands

5Auth0 ranked higher
6CyberArk ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionAuth0CyberArk
Pricing modelUsage-based—
Entry priceFree; paid from $35 / mo—
Free planYes—
DeploymentCloud (multi-tenant public cloud) or private cloudSelf-hosted and SaaS
ComplianceSOC 2, ISO 27001, ISO 27018SOC 2, SOC 3, ISO/IEC 27001:2022, ISO/IEC 27017:2015, ISO/IEC 27018:2019, ISO 9001:2015, ISO/IEC 42001:2023, ISO 22301, CSA STAR, Cyber Essentials, Cyber Essentials Plus, FedRAMP High, Common Criteria, PCI DSS v4.0.1, HIPAA, IRAP, GDPR, CCPA
SupportCommunity forum, Standard support, Premier support, 24/7 supportSupport contact, Knowledge base, Technical community
Founded20131999
HeadquartersBellevue, WA, United StatesNewton, MA, United States
Employees—1,001–5,000
FundingSeries D · $332M raisedPost-IPO debt
Best forDevelopment teams adding login, SSO and authorization to B2C apps, B2B SaaS and AI agentsEnterprises that need to secure privileged access for human and machine identities.

Plans side by side

Auth0

Free$0month
Essentials$35month (500 MAU)
Professional$240month (500 MAU)
EnterpriseCustomcontact sales
Auth0 pricing

CyberArk

Pricing not available.

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Auth0

  • Developer-friendly customer identity and authentication
  • Strong, customizable CIAM for customer-facing applications
  • Default favorite for developer-centric consumer identity
  • Published plan tiers and pricing with clear limits
  • Free tier for getting started

    CyberArk

    • Market leader in privileged access management (PAM)
    • Strong identity security and credential risk mitigation
    • Security-first approach with strong behavioral analytics
    • Bridges standard access management with robust PAM and machine identity security
    • Strong for enterprises combining workforce identity with PAM

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Auth0 vs CyberArk”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/auth0-vs-cyberark, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.