Authentik vs Okta
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Okta is the stronger AI pick in Identity & Access Management: it has a visibility score of 56.9 versus 2.7 for Authentik, and ranks ahead in 0% of the answers that name both.
Choose Authentik if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (67% vs 39% positive)
- You need OpenID Certified coverage
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
Choose Okta if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (56.9 vs 2.7)
- You need ISO/IEC 27001 or ISO/IEC 27017 or ISO/IEC 27018 or SOC 2 Type II or FedRAMP High or FedRAMP Moderate or FIPS 140-2 or DoD Impact Level 4 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (5,000+ employees)
- Market-leading IAM platform
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Authentik | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.7% | 56.9% |
| Change vs last week | up+1.7% | down−0.9% |
| Rank in Identity & Access Management | #24 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 0.6% | 12.2% |
| Mentions this run | 2 | 38 |
| Positive in AI answers | 67% | 39% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Authentik +1.0000000000000002pp · Okta −3.3000000000000043pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Okta leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
1 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Authentik | Okta |
|---|---|---|---|
| Most affordable identity and access management platform that is still reliable | ChatGPT | #3 | #4 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Authentik | Okta |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $5 per seat / mo | $6 per seat / mo |
| Free plan | Yes | No · 30-day trial |
| Deployment | Self-hosted (Kubernetes, Terraform, Docker Compose, AWS CloudFormation); no hosted version offered | Cloud (SaaS) |
| Integrations | — | 8000+ |
| Compliance | OpenID Certified | ISO/IEC 27001, ISO/IEC 27017, ISO/IEC 27018, SOC 2 Type II, FedRAMP High, FedRAMP Moderate, FIPS 140-2, DoD Impact Level 4 |
| Support | Community Discord, GitHub community support, Ticket-based support (Enterprise over $1k), Dedicated support with SLAs (Enterprise Plus) | Online support (24x5), Knowledge base, Community forum, Premier Success Plans |
| Founded | 2018 | 2009 |
| Headquarters | — | San Francisco, California, United States |
| Employees | 1–10 | 5,000+ |
| Funding | Later-stage VC · $2M raised | IPO |
| Best for | Organizations that want to self-host their identity provider and keep control of their identity data, from homelabs to enterprises with thousands of users. | Organizations that need to secure workforce, customer, partner and AI agent identities from one cloud identity platform. |
Plans side by side
Authentik
Okta
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Authentik
- fully open-source, self-hosted IAM platform
- modern UI
- easy to administer
- affordable, reliable, secure IAM platform for business use
- highly flexible with built-in MFA and proxy outposts
- you must manage hosting, updates, backups, and security yourself
Okta
- Market-leading IAM platform
- Independent, cloud-native identity platform
- Broad SaaS integrations with SSO and MFA
- Top overall enterprise IAM recommendation
- Strong security effectiveness
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Authentik vs Okta”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/authentik-vs-okta, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.