ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
Revenue.ioThe Revenue Platform for Better Decisions
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
Clay vs Revenue.io
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Clay is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 2.9 versus 0.7 for Revenue.io.
Choose Clay if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.9 vs 0.7)
- You want a free plan to start
- You need SOC 2 Type II or ISO 27001 coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose Revenue.io if…
- You need SOC 2 or HIPAA or TCPA or CASA Tier 2 coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- Blends real-time conversation intelligence into sales engagement
- Named among key revenue intelligence platforms
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | Revenue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.9% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | down−1.5% | New |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #25 | #37 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay −1.5000000000000004pp · Revenue.io +0.7pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Clay leads on 2 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
ClayRevenue.io
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Clay ranked higher
0Revenue.io ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | Revenue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Deployment | — | Cloud, native to Salesforce |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, TCPA, CASA Tier 2 |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | Standard onboarding on all plans, Salesforce-certified implementation on Engage and Orchestrate, Dedicated success manager on Orchestrate |
| Founded | 2017 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Los Angeles, CA, United States |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Series B |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Sales and revenue teams of 15 or more seats that run on Salesforce and want dialing, coaching, engagement and AI in one platform. |
Plans side by side
Clay
Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
Revenue.io
ActivateCustomper seat, custom quote
EngageCustomper seat, custom quote
OrchestrateCustomper seat, custom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
Revenue.io
- Blends real-time conversation intelligence into sales engagement
- Named among key revenue intelligence platforms
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs Revenue.io”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-revenue-io, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.