Skip to content
SlateIndex
ClayBuild systems to grow revenue
vs
OutreachAgentic AI Platform for Revenue Teams
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3

Clay vs Outreach

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Outreach is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 55.1 versus 2.9 for Clay, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Clay if…

  • You want a free plan to start
  • AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 28% positive)
  • You need GDPR or CCPA coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)

Choose Outreach if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.1 vs 2.9)
  • You need ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or HIPAA or CSA STAR coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
  • Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Clay Outreach
Visibility score2.9%55.1%
Change vs last weekdown−1.5%down−20.3%
Rank in Sales Engagement#25#2
Share of voice1.2%10.1%
Mentions this run961
Positive in AI answers33%28%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Clay 3%

Clay −1.5000000000000004pp · Outreach −20.300000000000004pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Outreach leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
2.8%
58.9%
AI Mode
0%
63%
Perplexity
5.9%
43.5%
ClayOutreach

Head to head in AI answers

6 engine answers name both brands

0Clay ranked higher
6Outreach ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionClayOutreach
Pricing modelUsage-basedPer seat
Entry priceFree; paid from $167 / moContact sales
Free planYesNo
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPASOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, HIPAA, CSA STAR
SupportPriority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise planPlus support included with Amplify Core, Managed services included with Amplify Pro, Technical account management and enterprise support, Professional services packages for onboarding
Founded20172014
HeadquartersNew York City, NY, United StatesSeattle, Washington
Employees1,001–5,000501–1,000
FundingSeries B ExpansionSeries G · $489M raised
Best forGTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows.Revenue teams, from SDRs and account executives to sales managers, RevOps and customer success, that want prospecting, deal management, coaching and forecasting in one platform.

Plans side by side

Clay

Free$0month
Launch$167month (starting price as shown; monthly from $185 per FAQ)
Growth$446month (starting price as shown; monthly from $495 per FAQ)
EnterpriseCustomcustom, annual commitment
Clay pricing

Outreach

Amplify EssentialsCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify CoreCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify PlusCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Amplify ProCustomcustom pricing (seat-based + AI credits)
Outreach pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Clay

Profile in progress.

Outreach

  • Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform
  • Deep workflow controls and granular sequence analytics
  • Recognized as an enterprise leader by analysts
  • Strong multi-channel sequencing, AI-guided selling and forecasting
  • Quote-based pricing with no public prices
  • Heavy and complex, slow to configure
  • Annual contracts with minimum seat counts

Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs Outreach”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-outreach, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.