Clay vs Outreach
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Outreach is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 55.1 versus 2.9 for Clay, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.
Choose Clay if…
- You want a free plan to start
- AI answers describe it more positively (33% vs 28% positive)
- You need GDPR or CCPA coverage
- You prefer a larger, established vendor (1,001–5,000 employees)
Choose Outreach if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (55.1 vs 2.9)
- You need ISO 27701 or ISO 42001 or HIPAA or CSA STAR coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Clay | Outreach |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.9% | 55.1% |
| Change vs last week | down−1.5% | down−20.3% |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #25 | #2 |
| Share of voice | 1.2% | 10.1% |
| Mentions this run | 9 | 61 |
| Positive in AI answers | 33% | 28% |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Clay −1.5000000000000004pp · Outreach −20.300000000000004pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Outreach leads on 3 of 3 engines
Head to head in AI answers
6 engine answers name both brands
| Prompt | Engine | Clay | Outreach |
|---|---|---|---|
| How do I choose a sales engagement platform for a mid-market team? | Perplexity | #7 | #5 |
| Best sales engagement platform for startups | ChatGPT | #8 | #7 |
| Best sales engagement platform for startups | Perplexity | #8 | #7 |
| Best sales engagement platform for enterprise | Perplexity | #8 | #1 |
| Best sales engagement platform with AI features | ChatGPT | #11 | #1 |
| Which sales engagement platform offers a free trial? | Perplexity | #13 | #6 |
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Clay | Outreach |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Usage-based | Per seat |
| Entry price | Free; paid from $167 / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | Yes | No |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, ISO 27001, ISO 27701, ISO 42001, HIPAA, CSA STAR |
| Support | Priority support queue on Growth plan, Dedicated Slack channel on Enterprise plan, Dedicated growth strategist on Enterprise plan | Plus support included with Amplify Core, Managed services included with Amplify Pro, Technical account management and enterprise support, Professional services packages for onboarding |
| Founded | 2017 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | New York City, NY, United States | Seattle, Washington |
| Employees | 1,001–5,000 | 501–1,000 |
| Funding | Series B Expansion | Series G · $489M raised |
| Best for | GTM engineers and revenue teams that build their own prospecting, enrichment and outbound workflows. | Revenue teams, from SDRs and account executives to sales managers, RevOps and customer success, that want prospecting, deal management, coaching and forecasting in one platform. |
Plans side by side
Clay
Outreach
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Clay
Profile in progress.
Outreach
- Enterprise-grade, mature task-driven sequencing platform
- Deep workflow controls and granular sequence analytics
- Recognized as an enterprise leader by analysts
- Strong multi-channel sequencing, AI-guided selling and forecasting
- Quote-based pricing with no public prices
- Heavy and complex, slow to configure
- Annual contracts with minimum seat counts
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Clay vs Outreach”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/clay-vs-outreach, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.