Skip to content
SlateIndex
CloseThe CRM that does the work
vs
Reply.ioAI Sales Outreach & Cold Email Platform
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3

Close vs Reply.io

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

Reply.io is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 14.4 versus 2.8 for Close, and ranks ahead in 100% of the answers that name both.

Choose Close if…

  • You want a lower entry price ($19 vs $49)
  • AI answers describe it more positively (52% vs 42% positive)
  • You need SOC 2 Type II or CCPA coverage
  • Per seat pricing suits your budget better than flat tiers

Choose Reply.io if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (14.4 vs 2.8)
  • You need SOC 2 coverage
  • Flat tiers pricing suits your budget better than per seat
  • Multichannel outreach and AI-assisted engagement across email, calls, LinkedIn and more

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Close Reply.io
Visibility score2.8%14.4%
Change vs last weekdown−0.6%down−3.3%
Rank in Sales Engagement#26#6
Share of voice1%3.5%
Mentions this run623
Positive in AI answers52%42%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Close 3%

Close −0.5pp · Reply.io −3.299999999999999pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

Reply.io leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
1.9%
24.1%
AI Mode
3.9%
6.1%
Perplexity
2.6%
13%
CloseReply.io

Head to head in AI answers

1 engine answers name both brands

0Close ranked higher
1Reply.io ranked higher
PromptEngineCloseReply.io
Which Sales Engagement tools offer annual discounts? Perplexity#9#5

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionCloseReply.io
Pricing modelPer seatFlat tiers
Entry price$19 per seat / mo$49 / mo
Free planNo · 14-day trialNo · 14-day trial
DeploymentCloud (SaaS)—
Integrations100+—
ComplianceSOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPASOC 2, GDPR
SupportKnowledge base, Email supportLive chat, Email, CSM onboarding
Founded20132014
HeadquartersAustin, Texas, United StatesSan Jose, California, US
Employees51–20051–200
FundingAngelSeries A
Best forFounders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMSFounders, sales teams, and agencies who need results fast without juggling 5+ tools.

Plans side by side

Close

Solo$19per user / month (billed monthly; $9 billed annually)
Essentials$49per user / month (billed monthly; $35 billed annually)
Growth$109per user / month (billed monthly; $99 billed annually)
Scale$149per user / month (billed monthly; $139 billed annually)
Close pricing

Reply.io

Email Volume$49month, billed annually (1,000 active contacts; monthly $59)
Multichannel$89user/month, billed annually (monthly $99)
AI SDR Starter$500month, billed annually (1,000 active contacts; monthly $800)
AI SDR Growth$1,500month, billed annually (5,000 active contacts; monthly $2500)
AI SDR EnterpriseCustomcontact us
Agency Core$210month
Agency AI SDR$500month/client
Reply.io pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Close

  • Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
  • Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
  • All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
  • Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
  • Frequently included in CRM shortlists

    Reply.io

    • Multichannel outreach and AI-assisted engagement across email, calls, LinkedIn and more
    • 14-day free trial to test core sequencing and automation
    • Transparent self-serve pricing with annual discounts
    • Affordable, lower-cost option
    • Strong choice for smaller and mid-market sales teams

      Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

      Cite as: SlateIndex, “Close vs Reply.io”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/close-vs-reply-io, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.