CloseThe CRM that does the work
vs
Revenue.ioThe Revenue Platform for Better Decisions
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
Close vs Revenue.io
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Close is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 2.8 versus 0.7 for Revenue.io.
Choose Close if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (2.8 vs 0.7)
- You need SOC 2 Type II coverage
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
Choose Revenue.io if…
- You need SOC 2 or HIPAA or TCPA or CASA Tier 2 coverage
- Blends real-time conversation intelligence into sales engagement
- Named among key revenue intelligence platforms
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Close | Revenue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 0.7% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | New |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #26 | #37 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 0.4% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 2 |
| Positive in AI answers | 52% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Close −0.5pp · Revenue.io +0.7pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Close leads on 3 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CloseRevenue.io
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Close ranked higher
0Revenue.io ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Close | Revenue.io |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Per seat |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | Contact sales |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | No |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud, native to Salesforce |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, CCPA, TCPA, CASA Tier 2 |
| Support | Knowledge base, Email support | Standard onboarding on all plans, Salesforce-certified implementation on Engage and Orchestrate, Dedicated success manager on Orchestrate |
| Founded | 2013 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | Los Angeles, CA, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Angel | Series B |
| Best for | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS | Sales and revenue teams of 15 or more seats that run on Salesforce and want dialing, coaching, engagement and AI in one platform. |
Plans side by side
Close
Solo$19per user / month (billed monthly; $9 billed annually)
Essentials$49per user / month (billed monthly; $35 billed annually)
Growth$109per user / month (billed monthly; $99 billed annually)
Scale$149per user / month (billed monthly; $139 billed annually)
Revenue.io
ActivateCustomper seat, custom quote
EngageCustomper seat, custom quote
OrchestrateCustomper seat, custom quote
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
Revenue.io
- Blends real-time conversation intelligence into sales engagement
- Named among key revenue intelligence platforms
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Close vs Revenue.io”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/close-vs-revenue-io, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.