CloseThe CRM that does the work
vs
RoxRevenue Agents for the Global 2000
Comparison · Sales Engagement · weekly run Nov 3
Close vs Rox
Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?
The short answer
Rox is the stronger AI pick in Sales Engagement: it has a visibility score of 6.8 versus 2.8 for Close.
Choose Close if…
- You want a lower entry price ($19 vs $100)
- You need CCPA coverage
- Per seat pricing suits your budget better than usage-based
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
Choose Rox if…
- You want the brand AI engines rank higher (6.8 vs 2.8)
- You want a free plan to start
- Usage-based pricing suits your budget better than per seat
AI visibility side by side
Latest weekly run · Nov 3
| Metric | Close | Rox |
|---|---|---|
| Visibility score | 2.8% | 6.8% |
| Change vs last week | down−0.6% | New |
| Rank in Sales Engagement | #26 | #17 |
| Share of voice | 1% | 2% |
| Mentions this run | 6 | 15 |
| Positive in AI answers | 52% | — |
The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.
Visibility score trend
Weekly runs over the last 60 days
Close −0.5pp · Rox +6.8pp over 1 weekly runs.
Engine by engine
Rox leads on 1 of 3 engines
ChatGPT
AI Mode
Perplexity
CloseRox
Head to head in AI answers
0 engine answers name both brands
0Close ranked higher
0Rox ranked higher
Features, pricing & fit
| Dimension | Close | Rox |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing model | Per seat | Usage-based |
| Entry price | $19 per seat / mo | Free; paid from $100 / mo |
| Free plan | No · 14-day trial | Yes |
| Deployment | Cloud (SaaS) | Cloud, with infrastructure running on AWS |
| Integrations | 100+ | — |
| Compliance | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA | SOC 2 Type II, GDPR |
| Support | Knowledge base, Email support | Dedicated deployment and support team on the Enterprise plan |
| Founded | 2013 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | Austin, Texas, United States | San Francisco, CA, United States |
| Employees | 51–200 | 51–200 |
| Funding | Angel | Round at about $1.2B valuation, led by General Catalyst (reported from unnamed sources) · $50M raised |
| Best for | Founders, small businesses and sales teams that sell through calls, email and SMS | Global 2000 enterprise revenue teams |
Plans side by side
Close
Solo$19per user / month (billed monthly; $9 billed annually)
Essentials$49per user / month (billed monthly; $35 billed annually)
Growth$109per user / month (billed monthly; $99 billed annually)
Scale$149per user / month (billed monthly; $139 billed annually)
Pros and cons
Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand
Close
- Best for high-velocity and outbound sales teams
- Straightforward, predictable per-seat pricing
- All-in-one calling, SMS, and email cadences
- Strong customer satisfaction in recent reviews
- Frequently included in CRM shortlists
Rox
Profile in progress.
Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run
Cite as: SlateIndex, “Close vs Rox”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/close-vs-rox, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.