Skip to content
SlateIndex
Comm100The People-First, AI-Powered Omnichannel Customer Service Platform
vs
LiveChatLive chat software that grows sales
Comparison · Live Chat & AI Support · weekly run Nov 3

Comm100 vs LiveChat

Which one do AI engines recommend, and how do they differ on price, fit and features?

The short answer

LiveChat is the stronger AI pick in Live Chat & AI Support: it has a visibility score of 40.1 versus 5.3 for Comm100, and ranks ahead in 86% of the answers that name both.

Choose Comm100 if…

  • AI answers describe it more positively (50% vs 36% positive)
  • You need a self-hosted or on-premises option
  • You need ISO 27001 or SOC 2 Type II or HIPAA or PCI DSS coverage
  • Highly customizable omnichannel live chat

Choose LiveChat if…

  • You want the brand AI engines rank higher (40.1 vs 5.3)
  • You want a lower entry price ($19 vs $39)
  • You need SOC 2 Type 2 or WCAG 2.2 AA or PCI DSS SAQ A or Data Privacy Framework or BBB Accredited Business coverage
  • You prefer a larger, established vendor (201–500 employees)

AI visibility side by side

Latest weekly run · Nov 3

Metric Comm100 LiveChat
Visibility score5.3%40.1%
Change vs last weekup+0.7%up+1.3%
Rank in Live Chat & AI Support#12#3
Share of voice2.1%10.2%
Mentions this run1150
Positive in AI answers50%36%

The stronger value in each row is marked with a ✓.

Visibility score trend

Weekly runs over the last 60 days

0%25%50%75%100%Nov 2Nov 3Comm100 5%

Comm100 +0.7000000000000002pp · LiveChat +1.3000000000000043pp over 1 weekly runs.

Engine by engine

LiveChat leads on 3 of 3 engines

ChatGPT
0%
38%
AI Mode
2.6%
31.7%
Perplexity
13.3%
50.7%
Comm100LiveChat

Head to head in AI answers

7 engine answers name both brands

1Comm100 ranked higher
6LiveChat ranked higher

Features, pricing & fit

DimensionComm100LiveChat
Pricing modelPer seatPer seat
Entry price$39 per seat / mo$19 per seat / mo
Free planNo · 30-day trialNo · 14-day trial
DeploymentCloud or on-premisesCloud-hosted on Google Cloud in Texas, Iowa and Frankfurt, Germany
Integrations—200+
ComplianceISO 27001, SOC 2 Type II, GDPR, CCPA, HIPAA, PCI DSSSOC 2 Type 2, GDPR, CCPA, WCAG 2.2 AA, PCI DSS SAQ A, Data Privacy Framework, BBB Accredited Business
Support24/7 live chat, Email, Phone, Guided onboardingSelf-service help center, 24/7/365 support, Product Expert and dedicated team on Enterprise plan
Founded20092002
HeadquartersVancouver, British Columbia, CanadaWrocław, Poland
Employees51–200201–500
Funding—Management buyout
Best forOrganizations that need AI-powered support across many channels, such as universities, gaming operators, government bodies, banks and healthcare providers.Small teams earning their first revenue from chat, and scaling teams that want chat to drive sales; larger organizations can use the Enterprise plan.

Plans side by side

Comm100

Live Chat Startup$39agent/month
Live Chat Plus$69agent/month
Live Chat UltraCustomagent/month
AI AgentCustom
Comm100 pricing

LiveChat

Essential$19user / month, billed annually ($25 billed monthly)
Growth$79user / month, billed annually ($99 billed monthly)
EnterpriseCustomcustom
LiveChat pricing

Pros and cons

Themes from the AI answers that mention each brand

Comm100

  • Highly customizable omnichannel live chat
  • Secure digital engagement
  • Compliance support such as HIPAA, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and GDPR
  • Suited to regulated and compliance-sensitive organizations
  • Cloud and on-premises deployment options

    LiveChat

    • Free trial with no credit card required
    • Reliable, high-performance real-time chat
    • Polished website chat and straightforward agent workflows
    • Transparent, publicly listed pricing
    • Strong for e-commerce and sales-focused teams
    • Can become expensive and complex for growing teams
    • Free tier limited to 2 seats
    • Ratings vary by review site

    Data collected ·ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Mode·coverage 98.8%·next run

    Cite as: SlateIndex, “Comm100 vs LiveChat”, https://slateindex.ai/compare/comm100-vs-livechat, data of Nov 3, 2026. Licence: CC BY 4.0.